That first image doesn’t look classic double group to me. More like classic larger group.
I would have thought that unless you have an 1:8 twist, the 180s would be sub optimal and you maybe seeing that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That first image doesn’t look classic double group to me. More like classic larger group.
I would have thought that unless you have an 1:8 twist, the 180s would be sub optimal and you maybe seeing that?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks