Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
Like Tree20Likes

Thread: 270 load tests.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,701

    270 load tests.

    So, following up on my old post. I went back to my trials of 130g accubonds in 270win.
    MY last trials were seating the projectiles 30thou of the lands. This time I changed a few steps in the powder measures and set the COAL at exactly what Nosler reccomend.

    I think I have a winner.

    Name:  2015-07-11 15.21.44.jpg
Views: 342
Size:  426.7 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.21.51.jpg
Views: 362
Size:  407.4 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.22.02.jpg
Views: 355
Size:  424.1 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.22.09.jpg
Views: 366
Size:  396.8 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.22.15.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  421.9 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.22.22.jpg
Views: 358
Size:  409.3 KBName:  2015-07-11 15.22.29.jpg
Views: 340
Size:  414.9 KB

    Those targets without 5 shot , groups are because the bolt wouldn't close on the handload easily so I didn't shoot it.

  2. #2
    Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Central NI
    Posts
    5,087
    What load did you stick with out of interest.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Dan M

  3. #3
    Member dogmatix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northern Gaul (Pukekohe)
    Posts
    6,045
    Don't be stuck with a COAL they recommend.
    You need to find the right distance to the rifling that suits your rifle and handloads and that fits in your magazine.
    Is your Remmie drop mag or floor plate? Floor plate is better, as you can seat the projectiles out more.

    So with the 53.5gn load, try some seated 10, 20 and 30 thou of the rifling again.

    PS, if you couldn't close the bolt, check the headspace, as the shoulder may need to be bumped back 5 thou more.
    Last edited by dogmatix; 12-07-2015 at 11:52 PM.
    Welcome to Sako club.

  4. #4
    Addicted puku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Maniototo
    Posts
    2,018
    I had similar results with a 270win. We ended up with 53.5 gn.
    But I moved the oal out to 87.5mm IIRC
    Rule 5: Check your firing zone

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Danny View Post
    What load did you stick with out of interest.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Haven't loaded any more, looking like the 54g is the best.

  6. #6
    Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Central NI
    Posts
    5,087
    Good 1.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Dan M

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,701
    Had already tried the same span but different gaps between loads, went up in 0.3 last time and 30thou off lands. They were worse.
    A friend at deerstalkers reccomended reducing the COAL to nosler reccomendation, and its improved.

    Its a hunting rifle after all. Not paper puncher, so looking for first shot repeatability.

  8. #8
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,480
    Id say 53.5 is the best looking at group size myself.

  9. #9
    Lovin Facebook for hunters kiwijames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    7,205
    How big are the squares? 1"? To me something does not stack up with your results. Rather than show a "node" your results look too scattered to draw a decent conclusion from. 0.5g powder change should really not show such dramatic poi shift as well as change in group size. Have you tried a simple flat base or other known load to compare against?
    veitnamcam and PerazziSC3 like this.
    The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds

  10. #10
    Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Central NI
    Posts
    5,087
    53.5 and play with seating depths maybe ?? Could go 0.2 either way as well.
    I also shoot out further, at 100 mine was ok, at 200m &300m she was well out. Validate.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Dan M

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    343
    This has to be the first .270 tread that @Toby hasn't joined in

  12. #12
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    Quote Originally Posted by 6mm ackley View Post
    This has to be the first .270 tread that @Toby hasn't joined in
    I did laugh at it not gonna lie
    VIVA LA HOWA

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,701
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwijames View Post
    How big are the squares? 1"? To me something does not stack up with your results. Rather than show a "node" your results look too scattered to draw a decent conclusion from. 0.5g powder change should really not show such dramatic poi shift as well as change in group size. Have you tried a simple flat base or other known load to compare against?
    20mm squares (excel resizing them).
    Probably the rifle jumping around on the table off the bipod. Will be trying my caldwell rest at NZDA range.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Danny View Post
    53.5 and play with seating depths maybe ?? Could go 0.2 either way as well.
    I also shoot out further, at 100 mine was ok, at 200m &300m she was well out. Validate.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    These were from a while ago. Using 30thou off the lands.
    Name:  2015-01-29 20.44.34.jpg
Views: 268
Size:  413.1 KB
    Name:  2015-01-29 20.44.27.jpg
Views: 241
Size:  409.6 KB

  15. #15
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,480
    What do you aim for on those targets? Middle of middle box?
    veitnamcam, Toby and BRADS like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. German tests
    By el borracho in forum Trial, Pedigree and Bird Dogs
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 20-06-2017, 10:10 AM
  2. German tests
    By el borracho in forum Dogs
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-12-2012, 08:12 AM
  3. long range 338 tests
    By el borracho in forum Shooting
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 25-04-2012, 10:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!