20" seems a good compromise Tim.
18.5" is too short for a 6.5x55 in my mind, prob okay for a .260.
20" seems a good compromise Tim.
18.5" is too short for a 6.5x55 in my mind, prob okay for a .260.
Welcome to Sako club.
What?
That a 6.5x55 shooting a 140gn projectile with ADI 2209 through a 18.5" barrel might only be doing 2200fps, going to a faster powder away than the 2209 burn rate is not ideal for the cartridge.
Versus a 260, which could use a faster powder such as 2206H for the 140gns, so you could go with a shorter barrel and make up for lost velocity with tweaking the loads more.
Seems pretty basic to me.
Last edited by dogmatix; 25-06-2015 at 07:27 PM.
Welcome to Sako club.
It's just not correct
More like 2600 with 2209 dude
2745 with 2209 and 140gr from 20 inch 6.5x55
a bigger case = more speed, always. the difference between a bigger case and a smaller case decreases with a shorter barrel, but bigger pretty much always = faster
2206H sucks shit in a .260, it's never faster than 2209 with a 140 down to like a 4 inch barrel if loaded to the same pressure
Why too short? :3000fps with a 120TTSX, you're not gonna stand in front of it at 300, are you? Tahr don't, they tumble over a couple of times and say goodnight.
:2800fps with a 140 VLD Berger, you willing to stand in front of that at 500? Deer don't, they tip up and say goodnight too.
I have to do a load development on a 7mm Mag with a 17" barrel next week, now THAT, is too short!
I'd own and shoot shit out of an 18 inch 6.5x55, got a 19 inch .260 and it smokes things
PS, I own and load for a 24" 6.5x55 and load for a 22 7/16" 6.5x55, so I'm not talking out of my arse.
Welcome to Sako club.
Bookmarks