If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
Thanks for the info. The reason im considering running a 7RM as opposed to something more exotic is due to the overall cost to play, & availability of brass.
I already have a .338lm which has expensive brass (and projectiles). A quick look online places the 7mm blaser mag brass right up there with the .338LM, or maybe even more expensive - which is just not what im trying to achieve.
Im trying to have similar ballistic performance to my .338 with less hassle involved. Less component costs, less recoil, less fuss, and similar or better ballistics.
I think the two big selling points for me on the basic RM are -
A - the brass is comparatively cheap and available
B - the action for my rifle is very large so I should be able to seat the projectiles fairly far out as not to dig into case capacity (if I choose to run a mag). I think more modern cartridge designs alleviate that issue in a "normal" sized action, but I don't think its an issue for me as the action is massive (TRG M10). If I run a ,300wm mag its can take a COAL of 3.5", or if I bent the feed lips on a .338 mag a little bit I might be able to run a .338 m10 mag which allows for a 4" COAL.
If 7mmBM had comparably priced brass id consider it, but due to above reasons I don't think its the best option for me.
What about a 7mm Practical (7mm-300WM)
It should do what you want easy. Cheap and easily available brass.
It'll put you much closer to the ballistics of your 338LM
Without the expense of 28 Nosler brass
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
Bookmarks