If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
If 3300 and 52 grn, 3200 and 55 grain or 2950 with a 80 grn isn't good enough for .224 applications I don't know what is. Thats what I get from my standard .223 Tikka. My 20" .223 is right on its heels. BM2 and 2206H do it no trouble.
Im sure somewhere in the past the same words were spoken about the 222 rem and before that and before that. But the never ending search for a better mouse trap and a faster bullet goes on.
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
Bookmarks