Thread: Ar2213sc load data for 2213

Imr4831 is faster than both 2213and2213sc .You are better off starting a little low with the 2213Sc as it is a slower powder and you do not know how viable your 2213 is . The burn rates are as follows #132/137 https://hodgdon.com/wp-content/uploa...rate-color.pdf

Originally Posted by Tankd

Imr4831 is faster than both 2213and2213sc .You are better off starting a little low with the 2213Sc as it is a slower powder and you do not know how viable your 2213 is . The burn rates are as follows #132/137 https://hodgdon.com/wp-content/uploa...rate-color.pdf

My bad I got it arse about face , you should use the faster powder load as that will be a lighter weight load than a slower powder . The only question is do you have enough powder to make it worthwhile , although at the moment any powder is better than none .So using the 2209 as a start point could work, but still drop a grain or two as a test and work up.