Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Blending powders

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,599

    Blending powders

    The other thread about contaminated powder got me thinking.......

    Assuming they are all the same powder.
    Lets say you have a part used 500 gram tin of lot # 1
    and another 500 gram tin of lot #B
    Then you managed to score a 1 KG tin of lot #F

    Should you mix them together? Bearing in mind that each lot is already "mixed" to provide a consistant burn rate for us small time users.

    Or should you load develop each seperate lot?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,654
    Depends if you know or care about whether or not your particular powder has any lot-to-lot variation.

    I've had a new batch of AR2207 cause an increase of 150fps with a 45/70 which with a 300gr pill is significant. I would not blend new into old in my instance.
    Resident 6.5 Grendel aficionado.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    267
    I’ve done it before with 2209. I didn’t want to work up a load just to recheck it when I changed to a new container. Just make sure you mix it real well.
    6x47 and Howa1500 like this.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    436
    Haven’t done personally but friend did exactly what you describe. Mixed well and checked his mv against previous load. He wanted to avoid checking the load several times with different powder lots. Worked ok. I’ve had up to 10% variation between lots but most commonly it’s been negligible.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,599
    Personally I am ok with it. If you had all three lots at the beginning and just mixed them all to be a new lot and work up a load
    Or later on you decide to blend a nearly empty container into a newer lot I would blend them and work up a load ( but why would you .... just load the older tin first as you know its characteristics), then start the newer tin and work up a load

    I can see that with current supply there is going to be folk mixing old and new and just carry on, but that would be bad reloading practice

    Just trying to put the cart behind the horse.

  6. #6
    Member Cyclops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    In the Mainland
    Posts
    936
    If you're meaning blending lots of the same powder I've done it with 2208.
    Had almost finished loading with one batch then blended the next batch into a larger container and continued loading.
    Over time the loading container had more and more of the new lot and less of the old.
    Worked for me, didn't have to rework loads.

    Another time I loaded and tested an "older" batch of 2208 against the "newer" batch.
    24 rounds of each batch. Fired 10 shots with 2 sighters are 300 yards and 500 yards.
    There was not statistical difference is speed or accuracy between the batches.

    As 2208 is a powder ADI is almost always manufacturing I figured that ADI's quality control manages the mix to get consistency.
    That's my theory anyway.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,650
    Your blending is only going to be about an amount for 1 case?

  8. #8
    Member Cyclops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    In the Mainland
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by TeRei View Post
    Your blending is only going to be about an amount for 1 case?
    My blending was 500g of old batch with 500g of new batch and then adding new batch 500g at a time.

    I use/load between 8 & 13.5 kg of 2208 a season, 2500 - 4500 rounds.

  9. #9
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,797
    ok with doing it but for crying out loud put it back into origonal containers...NOT another bigger container without labels....
    I have AR 2213sc mixed with the older hodgdon equivilent and have used it like that for years,just keep adding in the newest batch and mixing it up well....

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Timaru
    Posts
    157
    I'll do it all the time. Once I've developed a load enough to know that I'll be using that powder I'll blend in a couple more lots. Then I'll finish load development /recheck it. When I've got a pound or two of powder left (depending on the cartridge size) I'll blend in the new lot. I've never had to re do load development this way as by mixing multiple lots of powder together it becomes close to the average.

    Just be careful that your mixing the same powder.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,650
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    My blending was 500g of old batch with 500g of new batch and then adding new batch 500g at a time.

    I use/load between 8 & 13.5 kg of 2208 a season, 2500 - 4500 rounds.
    But why? Just use a container till nearly empty and any little amount topped up by latest batch?. I use alot of BM2 for self and others.

  12. #12
    Member Cyclops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    In the Mainland
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by TeRei View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    My blending was 500g of old batch with 500g of new batch and then adding new batch 500g at a time.

    I use/load between 8 & 13.5 kg of 2208 a season, 2500 - 4500 rounds.
    But why? Just use a container till nearly empty and any little amount topped up by latest batch?. I use alot of BM2 for self and others.

    Seemed like a good idea at the time.

    Subsequently I tested different batches of 2208 and found no significant difference so I no longer blend.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    2,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    ..

    As 2208 is a powder ADI is almost always manufacturing I figured that ADI's quality control manages the mix to get consistency.
    That's my theory anyway.
    Might be a dangerous assumption from what serious Férs have found in the US. Apparently some batches of H4350 (2209) are significantly different .

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Quote Originally Posted by 6x47 View Post
    Might be a dangerous assumption from what serious Férs have found in the US. Apparently some batches of H4350 (2209) are significantly different .
    Greetings All,
    I tested this in my 6.5x55 a couple of years back and found that the same load of 2018 AR2209 gave around 80 fps more velocity than either of my earlier two batches circa 1990 and 2000. This was done with all other components the same, loaded and shot on the same day. The chronograph readings from loads from years back showed that the older powder had not changed in speed over the years. It appears that this change happened in the 2000 to 2002 period. 80 fps is roughly the same as adding another 1.5 grains of powder. I could also find sets of load data that matched the two speeds.
    For this and a number of other reasons I think mixing two lots of a powder is a thoroughly stupid idea. You are adulterating your new lot by mixing it with older powder and it is easy to do a simple test. Load two cartridges of the old lot and two of the new and chronograph them. If they are close to the same then all good. If not then you can easily calculate and work up to your new charge with a few rounds. New batches of projectiles need to be checked as well. Later Hornady projectiles have their ogive in a different place and seating depth needs to be adjusted.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  15. #15
    Member Cyclops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    In the Mainland
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by 6x47 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    As 2208 is a powder ADI is almost always manufacturing I figured that ADI's quality control manages the mix to get consistency.
    That's my theory anyway.
    Might be a dangerous assumption from what serious Férs have found in the US. Apparently some batches of H4350 (2209) are significantly different .
    As I understand it the volume of 2209 manufactured is much smaller than 2208.
    2208 is almost continually manufactured therefore much easier to get consistency between batches.
    2209 is manufactured in batches at different time, therefore harder to be consistent.

    I was sharing my experience with 2208. I have found no significant difference between batches. Others may have.

    Other shooters should always use their judgement and test for themselves.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. .243 POWDERS
    By ANTSMAN in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-04-2022, 06:51 AM
  2. 243 powders
    By csmiffy in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-11-2021, 09:37 AM
  3. Blending powders
    By Ryan_Songhurst in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 14-10-2019, 08:04 PM
  4. Powders?
    By puku in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 31-08-2013, 01:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!