Haha.
You 223 guys have whipped the vegans for persistence and are now sounding like the godbothers who turn up on the doorstep and don't take hints that their time would be better spent on someone else's doorstep.
Haha.
You 223 guys have whipped the vegans for persistence and are now sounding like the godbothers who turn up on the doorstep and don't take hints that their time would be better spent on someone else's doorstep.
Overkill is still dead.
Like an Aa meeting.
Hey my names Bob and I have a 223
I have a 223. Except it's only a slow twist. Does that make me a vegetarian, not a vegan
Hope not, I won't be changing anytime soon.
Plenty of room in the magazine to hang them out long/heavy.
Shooting the 162s over 2900fps from a slightly shorter than factory barrel. Plenty of spice, heck 3000 fps with something heavier would kick more than a rodeo bronc
Owwwwwww pretty!
Greetings @McNotty,
All that you say is true and they are my sentiments exactly. Not everyone buys a rifle based on a clear assessment of its attributes though and the 7mm Rem Mag does have name recognition and a 60 plus year head start. The .308 is surely a better cartridge for most than the .303, more so when you consider the rifles. The .308 precedes the 7mm RM but has it wiped out all the .303 rifles? Regarding the VW Holden comparison at least VW still manufactures cars while Holden is gone forever.
Regards Grandpamac.
Stop with the headstamps.
180 ELD-M smashed the gates down a while ago, but few had rifles with enough twist in the tube to take advantage.
If you build out a 24" 7mm08 with a 3" mag box, it'll make 2600 with the 180ELDM and a case full of the right powder (Superformance, Staball 6.5 or RL-16).
The big magnums ( 7RM, 7PRC, 28 Nosler, 7mm Remington Ultra Mag) with 26" tubes will need anywhere between 20-30 grains more of the precious powder (which Hornady themselves admit to having a hard time finding) to break the 3,000 fps mark with the same bullet.
Unless you are shooting past 1.5km at sea level on the regular, you don't need a rifle-bullet combo that aggressive to stay above transonic.
Biggest advantage of the 7PRC is factory ammo with decent bullets. But they could have played smart and done a 7mm Creedmoor or 6.5-7PRCW as a factory offering... the latter is seeing a lot of attention in F-open
Depends who does the barrel and chamber job, the old 1:9 1/2" twist Sako/Tikka's and SAAMI dimensions are a long way off optimal.
ADG 7 Rem Mag brass is near enough the same price as 7SAUM/7PRC/6.5-7prcw
Would be mental to start a new rifle build with 7 Rem Mag unless the goal was to shoot dismal, over-priced factory ammo that is designed to fit in semi-auto's.
Time will tell. The wsm's were meant to end the old magnums. they didnt. In fact id say the PRC's will end the wsm's before they do the Old mags. I personally didnt overly like the 7mm rem mag when I had one. mainly feed issue based in the rifle I had. But it worked. It was never super popular unless you were after something a little extra.
I mean if I had to pick up either a 223 or a 7mm Mg, it would be the 7mm everyday.
Ive seen a couple of people lately who bought the PRC and did the choppy choppy thing and ended up disappointed with a powder burning 7x57.
Its going to depend on if you reload or not to get the best out of these things.
Bookmarks