Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
Like Tree20Likes

Thread: Electronic scales

  1. #1
    Caretaker - Gone But Not Forgotten jakewire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    here
    Posts
    7,477

    Electronic scales

    How many here use the likes of Chargemaster , the Lyman equivalent or etc for your reloading
    I'm still tapping out each charge from a teaspoon on to a small electronic scale then checking with the balance beam every 5 loads

    With the amount of calibres I have now I'm thinking there has to be a better way

    Do those that use these devices such as the Chargemaster find them accurate and reliable?
    Any problems I should look out for ? and of course finally, which one would you buy or recommend for someone to buy.
    Thanks.
    Tahr likes this.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    436
    I’ve been looking into this for the same reason. Looking at various forums and reviews the charge master seems the most accurate and repeatable although there is a common mod required using a drinking straw I think. The Lyman gets poor reviews

  3. #3
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,513
    Ive got a Lyman Gen6. It throws about 0.1gr light most of the time as that seems to be within its tolerance. For most loading, I dump a scoop of powder about 75% of the charge weight in tray first then let it do the rest, as this is faster than letting the machine do it all. I like it and dont plan on going back to scales & a trickler.

    Sent from my GT-I9192 using Tapatalk
    veitnamcam, Nibblet and mick like this.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    canterbury
    Posts
    1,644
    I’m using the hornady one, works for me, blaser hasn’t exploded so must be semi accurate
    Scooby likes this.

  5. #5
    Member Double Shot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Papamoa Beach
    Posts
    2,844
    Got the chargemaster lite myself, did my first loads and was stunned by the chrono when I had half my rounds with the exact same MV, certainly made sighting in work easy.
    No way will I be going back to the old way of doing things.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    2,599
    My personal belief is now to just use a very good powder thrower, and a balance beam. A good powder thrower should be +/- 0.1 grain charge to charge.
    Check with the beam every once in a while.
    If you are doing load developement, still use the beam to get that 0.001 result you want. For most hunting, and medium range target shooting a thrower is good enough.
    The accuracy loss is negligible on 0.1 grain and is more likely to be less than by a seating /neck tension anomaly.
    And the cost compared to an electronic charge churner is slightly less too.
    Of course this is all just what I think, and hey I already have the thrower, if you are starting out and bought a good quality E scale system, you wouldnt need a manual thrower and beam scale untill the E one goes on the blink.

  7. #7
    Member Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    W-BOP
    Posts
    6,536
    Lyman gen 5, love it.
    Identify your target beyond all doubt

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    2,095
    I use a chargemaster.

    Results may vary depending on the powder type you use and how much powder but I use only one powder AR2208 and two similar loads (.303 and 7mm08) and find it repeatable for that.

    4 throws out of 5 are the exact same weight eg 43.0 gr for me. I allow +0.1 but reject 0.2 if I see it. About every tenth throw is +0.2gr.
    Once it has dispensed the charge it beeps then takes 5-10 sec to stabilise and display the checked weight, which shows if its out or exact. I only wait and let it check every 5th load so some overloads will get through. However, I have confidence from hundreds of loads checked that very few are +0.3 or worse.

    I also weigh my standard machine nut a couple of times each session and it always comes out at 44.3gr. So it holds calibration within sessions and between sessions to better than 0.1 gr.

    Tips / superstitions for use:
    Check the flush out tap is closed before pouring powder into the hopper. So it doesn't spill out all over the bench ...
    Don't let powder grains fall into the hole where the load cell is (directly under the dispensing tube if you take off the black plastic doolacki.
    I don't run the radio or anything else off the same power point.
    Shed door is closed to keep out draughts.
    Don't try to do anything else like seating bullets while dispensing all the powder. Any bump on the bench can give an out of whack weight.
    I use a big MacDonalds Cream Freeze straw ( 0.308" dia) in the dispense tube which improves speed and consistency.
    I've adjusted the dispense rate (goes in 3 steps) according to instructions posted by Spanners so search for that. The optimal weight breakpoints to slow down the dispensing will depend on your powder type and the total weight required so experimentation is needed.
    The time needed to dispense a load varies a lot for me. The slower ones tend to be more accurate and the very quick ones are sometimes overthrows.

    I'm loading ammo for short range hunting and for gongs out to 500m, its not long long range nor bench rest.

    I can also get quick and accurate charges using a Lee loader plastic dipper followed by hand trickling into the electronic scales pan and if you don't have the money just now for the full setup that would be very good, just buy the RCBS scales part. I'm not sure the chargemaster is hugely quicker than a beam balance but its much less stress and frustration - just a period of "zoning out" towards the end of a session before the sweet job of seating the projectiles. I would say if you load more that 200-300 rounds a year its probably worth the money.
    Imfree likes this.

  9. #9
    Fulla
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cni
    Posts
    1,660
    Charge master, I will never go back to spoons unless there's a power cut and zombies are coming.
    I use the straw.
    I use the check weights/calibrate every time, before starting.
    Have tweezers ready to take out the odd kernal. Or dump back in the hopper.
    Heaps quicker! Pour powder, seat, measure, pour powder.
    jakewire likes this.

  10. #10
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,686
    At WBC 14 a very wise man told me that the chargemaster I was using at the time really wasn't up to the task.

    Quite a few Guys were using them & he was quite correct.

    It will show 51.5 for instance constantly but when checked with a proper scale they certainly aren't all 51.5 they can easily be .2-.3 either way.

    Depending on the powder, powder throwers, even very good ones, will have the same sort of variance, the coarser the powder the worse it gets.

    Not that I think it makes any difference, especially on big cartridges, would do on something like a 22 Hornet or subsonic rounds.
    johnd likes this.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  11. #11
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,680
    I have to hornady auto chargers that work mint.
    I seat the projectiles as it's spinning out the next charge which makes for dam quick reloading.

    Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
    Smiddy likes this.
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  12. #12
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    I use a Lyman gen6. Had it for around 6 yrs. Had a pact system before that which was OK.

    There are a few tricks to get gen 6 to work well and accurately but they're pretty easy.

    They also over time and use, require a bit of simple maintenance especially if you use different corded or fine ball powders.

    My K Hornet has an average ES of 17fps depending on the day and projectile.
    My 260 and 223 are around or under 12fps.

    ES is not solely reliant on an accurate charge weight, but it is a good start.

    I rarely shoot the 223 or K Hornet at ranges that I would even worry about a half grain fluctuation. But I never have that issue as it never throws a charge more than .1 out with any powders I have used.

    By the time I seat a projectile the next charge has been thrown.
    I have 2 separate check weights that have been verified on other devices and use them to check the scale before, after and sometimes during a session and it has never been out that I recall.
    They are plasticy and tinny but for the money they're not bad. I would never go back to beam scales and would happily buy another if the one I have dies.






    Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
    Nibblet and chainsaw like this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  13. #13
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,972
    I have a Lyman gen 6 also, I seat projectile while it drops the next charge and even me wobbling the bench around with the press doesnt seem to phase it.
    It does like a decent warm up time tho but if warmed up throws .1 under or bang on 99% of the time.
    As to the actual accuracy of the scales I cant comment as I have nothing of known accuracy to check them against but a cursory check of a few loads on my beam scales when I first got it showed it to be pretty bloody consistent.
    Mathias likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  14. #14
    Ejected
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    HBC, NORTH of Auckland
    Posts
    5,249
    Yup gen6 like these guys, also had some jewellery scales that were super accurate that I would check against randomly throughout a session.

    I also keep my cellphone, fluorescent lights, WiFi devices etc away from them. Most newer ones are shielded but still I try keep things that'll interfere away from it as I've seen other models thrown out in the past.

  15. #15
    Member wsm junkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northern Rangitikei
    Posts
    1,491
    +1 for the Hornady despenser.
    Once I tweaked the programming (which is simple) I hardly ever get over charges.
    I use to check every 5th one on my balance scales but dont bother anymore

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Beam scales vs Electronic
    By viper in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 25-07-2016, 09:57 PM
  2. electronic vs beam scales
    By PerazziSC3 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-08-2013, 10:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!