Thread: Enfields.

The P14/17 models are a mauser type action and just as strong although there is a lot of scuttlebutt out there about eddystone actions being brittle/hard from poor heat treating and barrels being super tight with their removal causing small cracks in the receiver. One comment I found was there was double the amount of eddystones mad than the others so any failures would be pronounced although on average just the same.
They were used for a shit ton of magnum calibre conversions right up past 458.
I cant see how the original 303's were any worse than any others until they got to the no4.
And no I wouldn't be trying to hot rod them too much myself in the weaker actions although when I do start with my p14 based model e's I might a little.
Nick Harveys reloading data for the 303-25 suggested 2-3 grains more would be possible in the P14 action

Originally Posted by csmiffy

The P14/17 models are a mauser type action and just as strong although there is a lot of scuttlebutt out there about eddystone actions being brittle/hard from poor heat treating and barrels being super tight with their removal causing small cracks in the receiver. One comment I found was there was double the amount of eddystones mad than the others so any failures would be pronounced although on average just the same.
They were used for a shit ton of magnum calibre conversions right up past 458.
I cant see how the original 303's were any worse than any others until they got to the no4.
And no I wouldn't be trying to hot rod them too much myself in the weaker actions although when I do start with my p14 based model e's I might a little.
Nick Harveys reloading data for the 303-25 suggested 2-3 grains more would be possible in the P14 action

From "The UK pattern 1913, Pattern 1914 and the US model of 1917 by Marc Gorelick"
http://www.vgca.net/education/TheUKP...2014-09-17.pdf

For P14 production
Eddystone: 604xxx
Winchester: 235xxx
Remington: 403xxx

Interesting that double the amount of M1917's were produced than P14's