Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: G7 BC's

  1. #16
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post
    I imagine eventually Kiwi Greg will build something that actually fires a G1 standard projectile.

    Till then Brian Litz G7s are probably the best option and then testing testing testing. Knowing what the number is helps if you plan on tweaking it a little.

    Shooting to 500m and tweaking the BC to better fit your results may put you out, further out. Maybe not much, but maybe enough. It's ok as long as you know your tweaking your BC to suit your chosen range, and the atmospheric conditions you worked it out in.

    I shoot with a droll little chap that likes to point out little things make little differences at range, and mostly little differences can be ignored. But, lots of little differences stacked together equals a big difference.
    It is surprising how much the BC changes as the projectile slows down.

    The big 375 projectiles are usually pretty good right out to 2000-2200 yards then it all turns to poos & you need to add more & more, 6moa from memory at 2500 yards, that is quite a bit nearly 4metres, at this stage I only have G1 BCs for them.

    I guess the small ones do the same thing if you can be bothered shooting them far enough & can see the strike.

    I have better results with Shawn Cs stepped G1 BC over Bryan Ls G7, with the 300 Bergers, there is very little in it until you way out there.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  2. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    899
    Die G1, die, die, die!

    If I understanding the attached paper correctly it compares Litz vs companies, but assuming that Litz did it right?
    If one compares Lapua computation (doppler/ measured all along trajectory) with a Litz calculation (estimated/measured at points of the trajectory) one finds discrepancies.

  3. #18
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Norway View Post
    Die G1, die, die, die!

    If I understanding the attached paper correctly it compares Litz vs companies, but assuming that Litz did it right?
    If one compares Lapua computation (doppler/ measured all along trajectory) with a Litz calculation (estimated/measured at points of the trajectory) one finds discrepancies.
    What magnitude of discrepancies? Can you share the comparison?

  4. #19
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post
    I predict he will say a number of centimeters.

    You will say it is too small to be relevant.
    It depends

  5. #20
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post
    On how many centimeters?
    Yeah. Pretty much. My ignoring certain things at certain ranges isn't unconsidered.

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    899
    4-5 clicks

  7. #22
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg View Post

    I have better results with Shawn Cs stepped G1 BC over Bryan Ls G7, with the 300 Bergers, there is very little in it until you way out there.
    I discovered with 338 DCM in the weekend that I needed to use the G7, mainly I guess because with a muzzle velocity of 3450fps with the 300s, the G7 is a better fit than the stepped G1.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  8. #23
    Member Tui4Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    366
    Swapping between G7 and G1 BC's on my 7mm RM with 162 Amax does not even account for a single click value out to 800yards on my ballistic app.

  9. #24
    Member Tui4Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    366
    Does not seem to make real difference in my particular case until way out there.

    G1 1500 yards 45.36 MOA
    G7 1500 yards 46.08 MOA

  10. #25
    Member Tui4Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    366
    Quote Originally Posted by Tussock View Post
    Does it actually support G7 or did they just change the name and its still running G1?
    I'm using Ballistic AE which uses the JBM computer and has all Bullet G1 drag models as well as Litz's G7 data

    Ballistic: The Pro Ballistic Trajectory Computer for the iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!