Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
Like Tree34Likes

Thread: Incremental load test anomalies

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,598

    Incremental load test anomalies

    Ok you gurus..

    How often if ever, do you find in developing an incremental load test (often called a ladder), that your fastest chronoed average fps is not your heaviest powder charge?

    I'm as meticulous as I know how to be, weighing each charge individually on a well zeroed balance beam scale and trickling up.

    Yesterday my 3 shot average was just over 150 fps more at 3 0.5gn steps below max charge..

    Possibilities:
    - I'm not as meticulous as I think I am
    - there is something varying at the range I am not aware of
    - my chrony chrono is off
    - a little pixie is yanking my chain

    I have found this over time with different calibres, powders, bullet weights and rifles.

    I'm no expert.

    So, what is happening please?
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

  2. #2
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,383
    I think what you seeing it what folks look for.....the flat spot in velocity means everything wrung out you can get,any more is wasted..... personally i wont/dont use chronicgraph but if your fast load is accurate...and is as you say couple grains below maximum....embrace it and stick with it..... and pixies pinned by wings to target board is not as much fun as it may first appear to be,
    Woody likes this.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,598
    Bahaa..that was fast Micky, yeah I did wonder if the law of diminishing returns applied. Cheers
    Micky Duck likes this.
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

  4. #4
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,491
    Many many things.....
    If using an optical chrono take the velocities with a grain of salt. The results are often consistent but rarely accurate. They are good for identifying ES(velocity spread for given charge weights) but average for accurate velocity readings.
    Brass prep can effect it variable neck tension clean or carboned up brass plus many other variables.
    It really depends how deep down the rabbit hole you want to go.
    There are so many things that can all effect velocity and accuracy it really depends what your trying to achieve.
    Moa Hunter and Jhon like this.
    #DANNYCENT

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,598
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    Many many things.....
    If using an optical chrono take the velocities with a grain of salt. The results are often consistent but rarely accurate. They are good for identifying ES(velocity spread for given charge weights) but average for accurate velocity readings.
    Brass prep can effect it variable neck tension clean or carboned up brass plus many other variables.
    It really depends how deep down the rabbit hole you want to go.
    There are so many things that can all effect velocity and accuracy it really depends what your trying to achieve.
    Thks.

    My top goal is accurate tight groups. I.e. having a clue where my bullet is going to strike at a given range

    Second is sufficient down range energy to do the job. Or, the distance down range the projectile runs out if humane puff

    For the most part the chrono could be dispensed with. Most of my shooting is under 200m. If I can print paper with a consistent group at 100m the rest is somewhat academic

    However, I am interested in being able to make an effective killing shot beyond 200m. If I can establish a reasonably approximate fps then of course I can get and idea of bullet drop and bullet energy at different distances.

    But, its still not a huge deal to me. If I'm uncertain at 350m I'll get closer.

    I have a place I can set gongs up out to 500m. With a large piece of cardboard behind. That exercise is arguably more important than accurate chronographing.

    Nevertheless I thought it a useful question to explore.
    Cheers
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,598
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    Many many things.....
    If using an optical chrono take the velocities with a grain of salt. The results are often consistent but rarely accurate. They are good for identifying ES(velocity spread for given charge weights) but average for accurate velocity readings.
    Brass prep can effect it variable neck tension clean or carboned up brass plus many other variables.
    It really depends how deep down the rabbit hole you want to go.
    There are so many things that can all effect velocity and accuracy it really depends what your trying to achieve.
    Thks.

    My top goal is accurate tight groups. I.e. having a clue where my bullet is going to strike at a given range

    Second is sufficient down range energy to do the job. Or, the distance down range the projectile runs out of humane puff

    For the most part the chrono could be dispensed with. Most of my shooting is under 200m. If I can print paper with a consistent group at 100m the rest is somewhat academic

    However, I am also interested in being able to make an effective killing shot beyond 200m. If I can establish a reasonably approximate fps then of course I can get an idea of bullet drop and bullet energy at different distances.

    But, its still not a huge deal to me. If I'm uncertain at 350m I'll get closer.

    I have a place I can set gongs up out to 500m. With a large piece of cardboard behind. That exercise is arguably more important than accurate chronographing.

    Nevertheless I thought it a useful question to explore.
    Cheers
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

  7. #7
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,491
    Quote Originally Posted by Jhon View Post
    Thks.

    My top goal is accurate tight groups. I.e. having a clue where my bullet is going to strike at a given range

    Second is sufficient down range energy to do the job. Or, the distance down range the projectile runs out of humane puff

    For the most part the chrono could be dispensed with. Most of my shooting is under 200m. If I can print paper with a consistent group at 100m the rest is somewhat academic

    However, I am also interested in being able to make an effective killing shot beyond 200m. If I can establish a reasonably approximate fps then of course I can get an idea of bullet drop and bullet energy at different distances.

    But, its still not a huge deal to me. If I'm uncertain at 350m I'll get closer.

    I have a place I can set gongs up out to 500m. With a large piece of cardboard behind. That exercise is arguably more important than accurate chronographing.

    Nevertheless I thought it a useful question to explore.
    Cheers
    Find a stable es charge and providing it shoots good groups varify velocity by shooting at longer ranges and calculate velocity by using the drop.
    shooternz, Jhon and RugerM77 like this.
    #DANNYCENT

  8. #8
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,300
    Loads where the powder is starting to be compressed often show a reduction in velocity. I'm buggered if I know why though.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tokoroa
    Posts
    1,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    Loads where the powder is starting to be compressed often show a reduction in velocity. I'm buggered if I know why though.
    It is the neck of the case there is only so much gas can flow through the neck of the case when the maximum flow rate is exceeded there is a bottle neck and the gas flow
    can't flow fast enough and starts to swirl slowing down the gas and drops the velocity, I did some tests years ago and found as the powder charge went up the velocity
    started to go backwards as much as 10fps for 0.5 grain increase .
    rupert, Moa Hunter and Micky Duck like this.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,598
    Quote Originally Posted by shooternz View Post
    It is the neck of the case there is only so much gas can flow through the neck of the case when the maximum flow rate is exceeded there is a bottle neck and the gas flow
    can't flow fast enough and starts to swirl slowing down the gas and drops the velocity, I did some tests years ago and found as the powder charge went up the velocity
    started to go backwards as much as 10fps for 0.5 grain increase .
    Thats very interesting, thks!
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Jhon View Post
    Thats very interesting, thks!
    Greetings @Jhon, @shooternz,
    I had read about velocity decreasing with increasing powder charge before but it is nice to hear from someone who has actually tested it. From what I remember pressure still increased with the charge so you seem to to have found your load @Jhon. Generally I load up to a max velocity rather than a max charge so for me my 35P chronograph is essential. I use a 4 foot screen spacing which improves accuracy and the proof channel (a separate reading using a second stop screen) alerts me to the very occaisional dud reading. This system is very useful for loading for older cartridges where load data is varied to say the least. No need to go doawn any rabbit holes for this one. As far as the longer range stuff you need to verify your longer range POI by actually shooting at that range. Preferably zero at 200 metres as well.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Jhon and RugerM77 like this.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,213
    Sometimes brass can be the culprit, weight sorting can help as often the heavier cases can have a lower internal capacity creating higher pressure. Brass from different lots can have a similar effect as well, neck tension and thickness can have an affect as well.

    Could just be your chronograph playing up when clouds go by or if the light is not quite at the right angle, mine is hopeless in the late afternoon.

    These are things that can make you start pulling your hair out. Settle on a load and go and see what it does at longer range because that will be the best indicator of what it will do in the field. If you can get out and set up some gongs, say one at 300 and one at 500 and validate your load you'll be away laughing.
    chainsaw, Jhon and dannyb like this.

  13. #13
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,491
    Quote Originally Posted by Rated M for Magnum View Post
    Sometimes brass can be the culprit, weight sorting can help as often the heavier cases can have a lower internal capacity creating higher pressure. Brass from different lots can have a similar effect as well, neck tension and thickness can have an affect as well.

    Could just be your chronograph playing up when clouds go by or if the light is not quite at the right angle, mine is hopeless in the late afternoon.

    These are things that can make you start pulling your hair out. Settle on a load and go and see what it does at longer range because that will be the best indicator of what it will do in the field. If you can get out and set up some gongs, say one at 300 and one at 500 and validate your load you'll be away laughing.
    I started typing up a post with all this and other variables but didn't want to bamboozle the O.P there are so many many things....every time i think i have my system down to a point I'm happy with my process something else crops up
    My latest battle is trimming and getting consistent and even chamfering
    Rated M for Magnum likes this.
    #DANNYCENT

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,213
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    I started typing up a post with all this and other variables but didn't want to bamboozle the O.P there are so many many things....every time i think i have my system down to a point I'm happy with my process something else crops up
    My latest battle is trimming and getting consistent and even chamfering
    Yes in hindsight I could've left the first paragraph out

    What I was getting at is there is a list of culprits so long it's not even funny and trying to nail it down can you make you tear your hair out. Especially when there is a chroni involved ay @micky_Duck ?

    My method I pressure test with a ladder, load some to shoot groups at the high end of pressure, pick the load with the best grouping (fluke) load up some more and validate at range. Plenty good for shooting animals at 300.

    As for trimming and chamfering, I keep having to decide if I'd rather jump off a bridge or trim and chamfer brass.
    Micky Duck, Jhon and dannyb like this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,213
    Sometimes brass can be the culprit, weight sorting can help as often the heavier cases can have a lower internal capacity creating higher pressure. Brass from different lots can have a similar effect as well, neck tension and thickness can have an affect as well.

    Could just be your chronograph playing up when clouds go by or if the light is not quite at the right angle, mine is hopeless in the late afternoon.

    These are things that can make you start pulling your hair out. Settle on a load and go and see what it does at longer range because that will be the best indicator of what it will do in the field. If you can get out and set up some gongs, say one at 300 and one at 500 and validate your load you'll be away laughing.
    Jhon likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 7mm practical load test
    By i41do2 in forum Shooting
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28-06-2021, 09:01 PM
  2. Load test Sierra 130gn HPBT 6.5x55
    By T.FOYE in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-12-2020, 09:33 PM
  3. Test load temps
    By rusl in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 18-08-2018, 10:18 PM
  4. test pic
    By rossi.45 in forum Questions, Comments, Suggestions, Testing.
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-07-2018, 10:14 PM
  5. Load development / Ladder test
    By ebf in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 17-01-2013, 01:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!