Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Gunworks Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Loading 162 ELDX vs ELDM ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,977

    Loading 162 ELDX vs ELDM ?

    Have mostly used 162 AMAX or ELDMs in 284 & SAUM up till now. Thinking I might try the 162 ELDX as more of an all round load in my 18in 284. Any experience out there in loads & differences ELDX vs ELDMs ? Probably run a 20 or 30 thou jump. Are the ELDXs likely to hit pressure sooner ?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    944
    Have heard the eldx produce pressure sooner than the match version. From an 18” 284 I’d personally stick with the match line
    chainsaw likes this.

  3. #3
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,493
    Eld-m is always my first choice
    lau lau and chainsaw like this.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,424
    Yes iv found them to hit pressure quiker but their building of pressure/speed faster is a none issue if you work up I prefer the m myself be darn nice if they made a lighter one so I could use it in the 708 . Iv found the x better once’s it’s slowed down abit from mv in magnums so it could be darn good in a short .284 if you drive it at humble speeds
    chainsaw likes this.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South taranaki
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelton View Post
    Yes iv found them to hit pressure quiker but their building of pressure/speed faster is a none issue if you work up I prefer the m myself be darn nice if they made a lighter one so I could use it in the 708 . Iv found the x better once’s it’s slowed down abit from mv in magnums so it could be darn good in a short .284 if you drive it at humble speeds
    The 162gr eld-m work find in the tikka7mm08 with a long action bolt stop and magazine. Taken numerous goats and fallow from 10meters out to 600meters with my old one
    Using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by lau lau View Post
    The 162gr eld-m work find in the tikka7mm08 with a long action bolt stop and magazine. Taken numerous goats and fallow from 10meters out to 600meters with my old one
    Yea I found the same, I’m running 162 eldms out of my Kimber Montana 7m08 and haven’t struggled to take stags out to 500yards. Great lightweight setup for closer distances. Have had to seat them deeper than preferred, but they still group and shoot great.
    42.5g ADI 2208 - Alpha brass

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,424
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoph R View Post
    Yea I found the same, I’m running 162 eldms out of my Kimber Montana 7m08 and haven’t struggled to take stags out to 500yards. Great lightweight setup for closer distances. Have had to seat them deeper than preferred, but they still group and shoot great.
    42.5g ADI 2208 - Alpha brass

    I accidentally ruined some of my alpha brass loading 162 instead of 150 with my 150 powder charge was a good lesson

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,424
    Quote Originally Posted by lau lau View Post
    The 162gr eld-m work find in the tikka7mm08 with a long action bolt stop and magazine. Taken numerous goats and fallow from 10meters out to 600meters with my old one
    Mines a short action and intended for 400yards absolutely max also only 16” barrel

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,774
    Trying to understand your logic Kelton of a M being preferable at higher magnum velocities?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,424
    Quote Originally Posted by Dicko View Post
    Trying to understand your logic Kelton of a M being preferable at higher magnum velocities?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Iv had 162 175 200 and 212 eldx all fail sub 300 at magnum velocity’s yet to have an M fail just my limited experience however with 162 and 180

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    333
    The x vary in weight alot more than the m, but I suppose thats to be expected from a match projectile

  12. #12
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,254
    The X will hit pressure sooner. If you put them side by side with an M you can see how much more surface area they have. When I had my 284 I would hit pressure with the X but was fine at the same load with the M and could go higher.

  13. #13
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,854
    What do you mean by fail?

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,424
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    What do you mean by fail?
    Should have being clearer sorry pencil threw out of 7blaser mag and 300win mag all long barrels moving very quickly they all also contributed to some of my more impressive kills at longer ranges the most memorable being the 175 at 800odd yards big red was like someone had thrown buckets of blood down the hill

  15. #15
    Member SPEARONZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Nth island
    Posts
    453
    There is something about the 162x.

    My experience mirrors Kelton however I was shooting them slow at 2500fps.

    Never had a 1 shot kill from 100-400m. I put 3 into a spikers shoulder because he wouldn't drop. All rounds were centre shoulder.

    Shot another spiker at 100 that didn't even react, thought I missed then it drt with a second.

    Walked over to a hind that ran 10m and seemed to drop only to find her alive and needed to be headshot. That was the final straw to switch to eldm and the results were day and night.

    I've never needed a followup with eldms on maybe 20 deer/tahr.

    I am puzzled as to why they perform so poorly. The eldx was very very accurate in my rifle and was consistent shooting past 1k so it was a shame.

    It could be me, shot placement etc however I have no confidence in them now and a completely different experience after ditching them.
    7mmsaum and chainsaw like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 7mm 180grn ELDM for .277 145 ELDX
    By Nick.m in forum Projectile and Factory Ammo Exchange
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-08-2022, 11:05 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!