Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 27
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: Loading IMR 4895 in 308

Threaded View

  1. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    The 'Naki
    Posts
    2,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Rated M for Magnum View Post
    Hodgdon data uses Winchester brass. In my experience has a larger internal capacity than most other brass meaning you'll need a higher charge weight to get the same pressure/velocity than brass with a smaller internal capacity. Hornady data uses Hornady brass which in my experience has on average a smaller internal capacity than Winchester, that's why the charge weights are higher on the Hodgdon data. Internal ballistics is a whole other topic do we should leave it there

    Try and use at least the same brand of brass in your load development and final load, it'll save you many headaches.

    Same advice as always, start low at the minimum charge weight and work up through the charge weights paying attention to pressure signs and you'll be fine.
    I'm interested in this one brass approach as it is commonly stated. Genuine question here - How much does it really matter for hunting, especially for meat for the table?

    Why I ask:
    1. Anecdotally, most hunters by far are taking their shots, and kills under 200m with many, possibly the vast majority, under 100m
    2. If you are killing for meat, high velocity disintegrating style projectiles are not your friend for body shots. Slower
    2000-2600fps, or even down into the mid teens with cast, are going to kill effectively and give a cleaner carcass. So case capacity is hardly an issue if not chasing max velocity
    3. Under 200m a 50-80fps velocity variation at the muzzle from different combustion pressures arising from different case capacity is not going to give a meaningful difference in POI, all else being equal.

    So I understand the potential importance to bench rest shooters and long distance hunters, or to those wanting reliable head or neck shots where an inch variation might really matter, but for the vast majority of us, should we care?

    I do sort and keep my rifle brass in bagged batches of the same headstamp. But I load them all the same if I have an established hunting load. There is more variation in my shooting ability than I will ever get from brass variation I think. The only exception I have personally found is loading 22 Hornet to max loads with frangible tipped Hornady projectiles. Some case brands simply won't seat the bullet over a full charge and allow the round to load in the mag. But that is a different issue I think.
    I know a lot but it seems less every day...

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. BLR 81 in 243...anyone else loading one?
    By Tikka7mm08 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 16-02-2020, 08:19 PM
  2. loading for 223
    By Kiwiman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-08-2015, 06:48 PM
  3. loading for the 243
    By northdude in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 14-03-2015, 07:35 AM
  4. Loading some 45/70 BP
    By Maca49 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-11-2014, 10:38 PM
  5. Anybody Loading for the 25-303?
    By 303Guy in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22-12-2013, 12:13 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!