Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 12345678 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 110
Like Tree132Likes

Thread: Model 7 7mm08 150gn eldx load development

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444

    Cool Model 7 7mm08 150gn eldx load development

    So finally back in my happy place at the loading bench.

    I procrastinated long and hard about what pill/powder combo to use I my model 7 7mm08, there were a few unique challenges for this rifle.
    1 it has a short barrel at 17" (so should I use a faster powder ?)
    2 it has a short magazine being a model 7 (should I use lower bc flat base pills? )

    Ultimately there wasn't much choice powder is sparse at best and that's unlikely to change, pills well alot of the good performing flat base pills are already rocking horse shit (120gn nbts, 140gn nbts most of the barnes offerings).

    I procrastinated too long and was left with little choice so I took a gambe and went all in buying 3 boxes of 150gn eldx and 1.5kg of ADI 2209 the only reasonably suitable powder I could lay my hands on.

    I was a little skeptical about using 150gn eldx (a relatively long high bc pill) in such a short action, I was however encouraged by the fact that the hornady precision factory ammo shot under an inch in my rifle and was seated deep enough to be mag fed.

    Here's what half a day of case prep looks like.......

    Name:  20210720_100827.jpg
Views: 906
Size:  860.0 KB

    Name:  20210720_114352.jpg
Views: 1271
Size:  4.29 MB

    100 cases sized, prepped and primed- charge ladder weighed out ready to.seat.....
    #DANNYCENT

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,527
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    So finally back in my happy place at the loading bench.

    I procrastinated long and hard about what pill/powder combo to use I my model 7 7mm08, there were a few unique challenges for this rifle.
    1 it has a short barrel at 17" (so should I use a faster powder ?)
    2 it has a short magazine being a model 7 (should I use lower bc flat base pills? )

    Ultimately there wasn't much choice powder is sparse at best and that's unlikely to change, pills well alot of the good performing flat base pills are already rocking horse shit (120gn nbts, 140gn nbts most of the barnes offerings).

    I procrastinated too long and was left with little choice so I took a gambe and went all in buying 3 boxes of 150gn eldx and 1.5kg of ADI 2209 the only reasonably suitable powder I could lay my hands on.

    I was a little skeptical about using 150gn eldx (a relatively long high bc pill) in such a short action, I was however encouraged by the fact that the hornady precision factory ammo shot under an inch in my rifle and was seated deep enough to be mag fed.

    Here's what half a day of case prep looks like.......

    Attachment 173151

    Attachment 173153

    100 cases sized, prepped and primed- charge ladder weighed out ready to.seat.....
    Interested to here how your ladder goes I'm doing one with 2208 in a 20" Tikka.

    Sent from my CPH1903 using Tapatalk
    dannyb and CBH Australia like this.

  3. #3
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    I went 150gn eldx as I've had a flawless run with them in several 270 cal rifles win and wsm at 145gn so I figured chances were the slightly fatter heavier cousin would also perform well.
    Pretty much the factory ammo gave me a good start point as the mag was only a couple thou longer than the ammo.
    It shot well so I started there at 2.125" ogive length.
    I started my charge ladder with three rounds at each weight starting at 44gn going up.in .5gn steps to 46.5gn which is 1gn over book max.
    I was quite surprised when I loaded my lowest charge that I could feel that familiar crunch of a lightly compressed load....hmmm this doesn't bode well I thought.
    Anyway I continued crunching my powder right up to 46.5gn.

    Went to the range late afternoon, shot 3 factory rounds to check and yup shooting as expected and at the expected velocity.

    I was expecting a little more velocity but then this is my first foray into short barreled rifles so a bit of an unknown.
    Anyway I'll show the results of my velocity ladder and it should be pretty obvious which load I'm gonna use....
    No target pics as they are still at the range but also I shot them pretty quick to get done before the light faded.
    Best group under 1 inch and only horizontal deviation (most likely shooter) with a velocity spread of 3fps.....yup that'll do
    Goes to show, good consistent loading practice and case prep will give you good results.
    I'm going to load up 6 more tomorrow to confirm what I already know before pulling out the stops and loading 100. Job done ✔

    Name:  20210720_190649.jpg
Views: 1083
Size:  4.30 MB

    Velocity was less than expected but at 2576fps I'm happy that's plenty enough for dead reds out to plenty far enough.
    Last edited by dannyb; 20-07-2021 at 08:50 PM.
    Tahr, Mooseman, Micky Duck and 2 others like this.
    #DANNYCENT

  4. #4
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,460
    I run 140gr NBTs in my 15" barreled 708. Running Cfe223. Giving 2740 fps.

    They work pretty well out to ranges well past where im likely to be using a 15" barreled bush gun.

  5. #5
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Quote Originally Posted by GWH View Post
    I run 140gr NBTs in my 15" barreled 708. Running Cfe223. Giving 2740 fps.

    They work pretty well out to ranges well past where im likely to be using a 15" barreled bush gun.
    Yup and I could literally get my hands on 1 box then likely no more until who knows when....that's why I went eith the eldx at least I could buy 3 boxes and re stock should be less of an issue
    GWH and CBH Australia like this.
    #DANNYCENT

  6. #6
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Also I'm not that thrilled with the federal brass and considering "biting the bullet" and investing in lapua brass whilst I still can, is this likely to vastly effect my loads ? (Should I stop and wait till I have new brass and start again ?)
    Thanks in advance
    Last edited by dannyb; 21-07-2021 at 08:44 AM.
    #DANNYCENT

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    1,026
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    Also I'm not that thrilled with the federal brass and considering "biting the bullet" and investing in lapua brass whilst I still can, is this likely to vastly effect my loads ? (Should I stop and wait till I have new brass and start again ?)
    Thanks in advance
    My personal experience with 7mm08 lapua was it was far less capacity than other cases. I couldn't get to max book loads without stamping. Not a bad thing though same preasure for less powder!
    CBH Australia likes this.

  8. #8
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Quote Originally Posted by Hunty1 View Post
    My personal experience with 7mm08 lapua was it was far less capacity than other cases. I couldn't get to max book loads without stamping. Not a bad thing though same preasure for less powder!
    Did that result in same speed for less powder ?

    Now wondering if I should get Lapua or Norma
    #DANNYCENT

  9. #9
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    So an interesting quandary has arisen......
    It has been suggested that in the short barrel I may see better velocity with ADI2206h, I have access to about half a bottle but there is no load data that I'm aware of ?
    I was thinking I might load a ladder up starting at 38gn going up to 39.5gn as a bit of a test....anyone else got any data or able to feed that into quick load for projected results ?

    Had a quick look at 308win data for same weight pills and that would suggest a starting load of 40gn and max of 45.5 would it be safe to assume similar with the 708 ?
    Last edited by dannyb; 21-07-2021 at 08:44 AM.
    CBH Australia likes this.
    #DANNYCENT

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,161
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    So an interesting quandary has arisen......
    It has been suggested that in the short barrel I may see better velocity with ADI2206h, I have access to about half a bottle but there is no load data that I'm aware of ?
    I was thinking I might load a ladder up starting at 38gn going up to 39.5gn as a bit of a test....anyone else got any data or able to feed that into quick load for projected results ?

    Had a quick look at 308win data for same weight pills and that would suggest a starting load of 40gn and max of 45.5 would it be safe to assume similar with the 708 ?
    Greetings @dannyb,
    First and most important no it is not safe to use .308W data for the 7mm-08. Pressure will be much higher. I did a quick check on data for AR2206H 40.5 grains with 150 grain HPBT. Using a reduction of 30 or 25 fps per inch of barrel shortening suggests that AR2206H will come up short at 2,500 and 2,535 fps respectively. Lastly using the 30 fps per inch reduction suggests a velocity of 2,520 fps for your 45.5 grain load of AR2209. You are getting about 50 fps more than that. The Hodgdon data pressure is expressed in CUP (copper units of pressure) which suggests that the data was worked up in the 1990's. About 2002 the speed of AR2209 was increased hence your higher velocity and pressure. I reported on this some time back chronographing different lots of AR2209 in my 6.5x55. This would suggest that your additional 50 fps of velocity would put you about 1 grain over book max for the later AR2209. It looks like a good load none the less.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    dannyb and CBH Australia like this.

  11. #11
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings @dannyb,
    First and most important no it is not safe to use .308W data for the 7mm-08. Pressure will be much higher. I did a quick check on data for AR2206H 40.5 grains with 150 grain HPBT. Using a reduction of 30 or 25 fps per inch of barrel shortening suggests that AR2206H will come up short at 2,500 and 2,535 fps respectively. Lastly using the 30 fps per inch reduction suggests a velocity of 2,520 fps for your 45.5 grain load of AR2209. You are getting about 50 fps more than that. The Hodgdon data pressure is expressed in CUP (copper units of pressure) which suggests that the data was worked up in the 1990's. About 2002 the speed of AR2209 was increased hence your higher velocity and pressure. I reported on this some time back chronographing different lots of AR2209 in my 6.5x55. This would suggest that your additional 50 fps of velocity would put you about 1 grain over book max for the later AR2209. It looks like a good load none the less.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Was hoping you'd chime in thanks you have re-enforced what I probably already knew subconsciously....
    grandpamac likes this.
    #DANNYCENT

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,161
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    Was hoping you'd chime in thanks you have re-enforced what I probably already knew subconsciously....
    Greetings again @dannyb,
    After my post I did what I should have done earlier and went back over earlier data. It appears that Hodgdon/ ADI have dropped their max load of AR2209 with the 150 grain projectile from 48.5 grains to 45.5 grains likely in responce to the increased powder speed. I also spotted that you are using Federal cases. These weigh around 179 grains compared with 164 grains to 169 grains for just about everything else. This results in reduced case capacity together with increased pressure and velocity. The extra 10 to 15 grains of case weight works out to about 1.1 to 1.7 less grains of case capacity. I loaded some rounds in different capacity .308W cases a while back to get a better idea of velocity impact but have yet to shoot them. Go shoot some deer with those loads and the Federal cases might look a bit better.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  13. #13
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings again @dannyb,
    After my post I did what I should have done earlier and went back over earlier data. It appears that Hodgdon/ ADI have dropped their max load of AR2209 with the 150 grain projectile from 48.5 grains to 45.5 grains likely in responce to the increased powder speed. I also spotted that you are using Federal cases. These weigh around 179 grains compared with 164 grains to 169 grains for just about everything else. This results in reduced case capacity together with increased pressure and velocity. The extra 10 to 15 grains of case weight works out to about 1.1 to 1.7 less grains of case capacity. I loaded some rounds in different capacity .308W cases a while back to get a better idea of velocity impact but have yet to shoot them. Go shoot some deer with those loads and the Federal cases might look a bit better.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    I was happy with every other aspect of the federal cases the neck tension felt consistent when seating, just the primer pockets felt like there was quite a variance in pressure required to seat the primers using an rcbs hand primer....
    #DANNYCENT

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    475
    Quote Originally Posted by dannyb View Post
    So an interesting quandary has arisen......
    It has been suggested that in the short barrel I may see better velocity with ADI2206h, I have access to about half a bottle but there is no load data that I'm aware of ?
    I was thinking I might load a ladder up starting at 38gn going up to 39.5gn as a bit of a test....anyone else got any data or able to feed that into quick load for projected results ?

    Had a quick look at 308win data for same weight pills and that would suggest a starting load of 40gn and max of 45.5 would it be safe to assume similar with the 708 ?
    Use 154gr ADI data for the 150 ELD-X. That's how Hornady groups them in their reloading manual.
    2208 is the best burn rate for a 7mm08 with a barrel longer than 16 inches, if you can get it.
    Last edited by winaa; 22-07-2021 at 03:05 PM. Reason: spelling
    dannyb and CBH Australia like this.
    BC doesn't matter, until you need to dial

  15. #15
    Unapologetic gun slut dannyb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Oxford, North Canterbury
    Posts
    9,444
    Quote Originally Posted by winaa View Post
    Use 154gr ADI data for the 150 ELD-X. That's how Hornady groups them in their reloading manual.
    2208 is the best burn rate for a 7mm08 with a barrel longer than 16 inches, if you can get it.
    Like all things reloading 2208/varget is unobtainable just like 120/140gn nosler bts and cci primers
    #DANNYCENT

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. My first load development
    By Remmodel7 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-06-2021, 02:55 PM
  2. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  3. 300 Wsm Load development
    By mcche171 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-05-2019, 03:22 PM
  4. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!