31Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksSo, 2208 was a fail with the 53gr Vmax as suspected.
31gr and 32gr gave the better groups, but the velocities were to slow, 3120 and 3160. Even the 34gr load only gave 3250fps. To be worth the effort, I need to see a significant improvement from a 223 Rem (when this rifle was 223 Rem the 53gr were doing 3260fps with 26gr of BM2)
Narrow, long powder column maybe isn't as good for the slower powder and the light bullet. Any ideals of which powder for the heavier 68gr bullet?
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.
Search Forums
User Tag List
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 68
Hybrid View
-
25-11-2013, 10:47 AM #1Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Souith Canterbury
- Posts
- 1,802
Reply With QuoteTags for this Thread
- .270,
- 22-250,
- 2206h,
- 2208,
- 2209,
- 223,
- 260,
- 270wsm,
- 300mag,
- 410,
- 5.56,
- 6.5,
- 7.62x39,
- 708,
- 70gr,
- 7mm,
- 7mm rem mag,
- actions,
- annealed,
- arrow,
- away,
- barnes,
- barrel,
- bdl,
- blank,
- bm2,
- bullet,
- bullets,
- case,
- case capacity,
- cases,
- cci,
- chamber,
- cheap,
- contender,
- development,
- die,
- dies,
- extractor,
- face,
- feed,
- forming,
- forums,
- fps,
- grs,
- gunworks,
- lee,
- lee dies,
- lube,
- mag,
- mags,
- match,
- model 7,
- model 70,
- nea,
- poi,
- powder,
- pressure,
- primer,
- project,
- reloading,
- rem,
- rem mag,
- rifle,
- road,
- samples,
- seat,
- second hand,
- sharp,
- shortened,
- shoulder,
- smith,
- sounds,
- speer,
- stag,
- tapered,
- thompson,
- wallabies,
- win,
- winter,
- wsm
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
All times are GMT +13. The time now is 09:56 AM.
Bookmarks