Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Tentman

Thread: QuickLOAD parameters for H4350

  1. #1
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,007

    QuickLOAD parameters for H4350

    Does anyone have current parameters they could post or PM please? I only have old ones where 2209 and H4350 were different.

  2. #2
    Member Timmay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    2,679
    This what you are after?

    Name:  Capture.PNG
Views: 1037
Size:  9.2 KB

  3. #3
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,007
    Thanks Timmay. Below is what I have for v3.3 and I knew it was before the transition to 2209. 100ft/sec discrepancy from today now fully accounted for !

    Name:  quickload v3.3 H4350.jpg
Views: 786
Size:  33.4 KB
    Last edited by Puffin; 16-08-2016 at 10:03 PM.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Christchurch,NZ
    Posts
    751
    Quickloads's data for 2209 is still different from H4350, at least in V3.6

    Name:  2016-08-17_8-06-11.jpg
Views: 680
Size:  37.4 KB

  5. #5
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,007
    Strange that they should still be different though maybe the differences are now limited to batch variation ?

  6. #6
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    QL Version 3.9 @Puffin


  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    5,192
    I've pondered on this a bit and it must be batch variation as the powder is "the same". The basis of Quickload is actual testing of the powders and the output data always "offers" consideration of a -+ 10% range. Reading how the long range target shooters in the US do things - they invariably test each powder lot.
    Puffin likes this.

  8. #8
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,007
    Thanks @zimmer, and much appreciated. Parameters unchanged from v3.6.

    Referring back to the 6.5x47 pressure signs thread, I felt there was cause for concern because for H4350 the burn rate had to be backed off quite a bit from nominal to get a velocity match to my drop figures. I was casting around looking for a reason why the velocity - and presumably pressure - was low for what according to Quickload should have been charges bordering on excessive; maybe the pressures weren't low, and the Barnard/Lapua combination hiding this well, and for some unexpected reason the velocity not being developed.

    Only yesterday I thought I'd try plugging 2209 into the simulation , and the prediction was that I'd struggle with fitting enough 2209 into the case to get excessive pressures - the parameters for the two powders are that different.

    It's going to be a short-lived issue anyway. I'm just about out of H4350 (only purchased when 2209 was stocked out) and moving onto a keg of the real thing, so I'll soon find out how close they behave to each other in the real world.
    Last edited by Puffin; 16-07-2017 at 01:25 PM.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tokoroa
    Posts
    1,221
    My understanding from reading Hogdgon literature is that ADI powder that will be packed as Hogdgon is held to tighter a tolerance than ADI packed versions, I did a lot of load development with 2208 and Varget
    in my 6mmBR's for shooting F class,
    The difference between the two was not significant but was measurable Varget had lower ES and SD average velocity was close around 25 fps faster with Varget
    For practical use at 1000 yrds there was not enough difference between them to matter the atmospheric conditions wind and light changes were more of a problem
    plus driver error,
    Just buy as much of the same batch as you can, some of the well healed F class shooters buy enough of their favourite powder to outlast their new barrel same with bullets.

  10. #10
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,339
    Resurrection of an oldish thread...

    These variations between AR2209 and H4350 from version to version are somewhat frustrating, so I emailed Helmut the QL owner and he told me to always use the latest version of the Hodgdon powder, because those are the ones he tests. He does not test the ADI branded powder.

    Looking at the history of variations between AR2209 and H4350, either there's quite a lot of variation between powder lots or Helmut's tests are not consistent, one or the other.

    Anyway, I have accepted that I need to tune AR2209 as it models much lower velocities that I actually get for a given charge in my .243 and 6.5 Creedmoor.
    Just...say...the...word

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Rotorua
    Posts
    474
    I have always used the Hodgdon equivalents as I got better results tahn with the ADI powders.
    Good to hear from the the owner that he tests the new batches

  12. #12
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    The last lot of H4350 I tried was an identical match velocity and SD wise to a fairly recent AR2209 lot. I've experienced some surprising variation in batches of ADI powders in the past.

  13. #13
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by 10-Ring View Post
    The last lot of H4350 I tried was an identical match velocity and SD wise to a fairly recent AR2209 lot. I've experienced some surprising variation in batches of ADI powders in the past.
    Same. Especially 2209

    Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 2209/H4350 in 7mm rem mag?
    By striker in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 25-05-2016, 04:10 PM
  2. Quickload Advice Please
    By zimmer in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 13-06-2015, 05:24 PM
  3. Quickload Data
    By Link in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-08-2014, 09:25 PM
  4. Quickload?
    By Shamus in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-08-2014, 11:57 PM
  5. hodgdon load data for .270 - h4350 (2209)
    By hunter308 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-05-2014, 12:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!