How far would you push this on game. Will be reloading and have the choice of 120gr speer, 139sst or 150 eldx.
Just wondering if it's worth making the change to a lighter rig at the cost of a shorter barrel.
Cheers
Printable View
How far would you push this on game. Will be reloading and have the choice of 120gr speer, 139sst or 150 eldx.
Just wondering if it's worth making the change to a lighter rig at the cost of a shorter barrel.
Cheers
You can chuck some parameters in GRT to get a rough idea and go from there. I did that with 6.5 CRD to check that I could reach 300m with at least 1000ft/lb energy.
What powder will you use to reload?
I was using an 18inch 7mm08 and would regularly take fallow and goats out to 600 meters with the 162gr Amax.
I think the 120gr and 139gr sst would be OK out to 350ish meters.
Have bm2 2219 and 2208 which I will probably use
Use the right pill and you should be good to 400-500 yds. I’d be using 150 ELDx out of the ones you listed. 162 ELDMs would be better. Check your muzzle velocity & go from there. I tend to use 1800fps as cut off for 7mm pills, it’s more than 1000 ft/lbs
a far as can CONSISTANTLY make one shot,first shot hits inside 8" so put up 3ltr milk jug and find out.....
1000 Ftlbs is a nice guide. But to be honest knowing at which impact speeds your bullet of choice works is more important. Ie most solid copper bullets require 2000+ fps at impact, whereas something like an eld M may only require 1600fps but will blow up when run too fast. Also each individual bullet of a model isn't the same it I've often found 308 eld ms softer than 6.5 eld ms at similar impact velocities etc. As above I tend to use 1800fps for most lead core bullets as a safe guide and then if it meets that I check the ftlbs after and check it's not outrageously low but velocity is my first check. Plenty of heavier bullets have 1000ftlbs but not enough energy to expand whilst some light bullets barely have 1000ftlbs but have heaps of velocity and work much better.
As for a 16 inch 7mm08 I'd run the 150 eld x and I'd try get reloder 17 or Varget works well and you will likely get 2500-2700fps which should give you enough impact velocity to around 550yards but after that big thing is confirming your drops on target out to that range and your ability to make those shots in field conditions comfortably.
2208= varget
If you do the maths on 708 using 162 ELDM at around max load of 2208, you’ll find it’s fine for way out there. Normally doing around the 2500 fps mark out of 16”.
If you're using TTSXs, I'd limit shots to 350yds max, more ideally 300yds. I've killed deer past that with them but expansion isn't that flash past 300. With my 16" bbl, the 120s are doing 2930.
I chucked the values in GRT. With a conservative pressure value (theoretical), you could get 2450fps with the eldx. That has enough speed and energy up to 500m.
This all depends on how you actually go when reloading, but I'd say it'll reach as far as you can.
I’d take a slower 162eldm over a slightly faster 150 eldx any day. Theory is cool and all that but eldx at those speeds often only works in close.
2640 out of my 7mm-08 17 inch barell running 150 ELDX and 2208.Attachment 246682Attachment 246684
Get gordons reloading tool and play around with it.
Generally a heavier,slower projectile will be more "efficient" with a short barrel.
Not quite the same, but I was loading 123 sst for a 16" 260rem and had kills past 530m - projectile was picked for low speed opening and was much more than adequately accurate.
For real world experience I have shot a fair few reds out of my old T3 with a 16" Suppressed barrel. 43.5gns of 2208 behind a 140gn ballistic tip. They kill well and was getting 2580 fps at the muzzle . Very reliable to 500ish then starting to get too many variables for my liking.
Whichever works the best in your rifle.
Have had several sessions of serious bullet research, only to buy said bullets and find they won't shoot acceptably in my rifle or with the powders I have access ro.
Then try it on game at sub 200m.
Also, make sure you have a 'proven' bullet loaded in the magazine after the first round of a new load.
If I read the original question right "realistic range of a 16"..." id say no more than 300m. Sure on paper the heavies will work but you need a lot of experience to accurately place them in the field. With the unavoidable low MV of a short barrel wind and ranging errors are gonna screw you, you know physics.... ;) Now i'm not a hater on short barrels (love my 16" 308!) but if you want to reach out a bit further invest in a longer barrel and plenty of practice!
I would have thought the realistic range of a 16" 7mm-08 has very little to do with the actual cartridge and barrel length and instead is entirely dependent on the shooter. How much practice and verification of elevation and wind drift they have done, and their ability to dial (or not) a scope.
Some people shouldn't shoot past 100m, some are good to 300m, etc. etc. I've met the odd person that probably shouldn't shoot past 17" with a 16" barrel.
Know your gear and ability first and foremost. The projectile will kill way out there.
I don't think you'll have any issues with the 150gr eld X and a bit of 2208 of 2206H
I've confirmed my 7mm08( you're old 7mm08) to 475y using the holdover in strelock on the range but am yet to take a shot at animal that far
I just run 160gr TMK at 2413fps. Nothing special speed wise, have shot deer out to 255y(in the neck and it was a golf ball exit wound).
If you stepped upto a 162gr eld M I don't think you'll worry about it blowing up, last one I shot with my TMK load was in the neck at 33paces, hand sized entry wound and it dropped it, never lost a animal with this load. The other round I would look at is the 145gr speer BTSPAttachment 246712
What I’ve done a few times over the years is work out what my maximum effective range is by actually testing it. An old door or plastic drum works well… prop it up with a decent sized cross painted / inked along the top and shoot at the cross from various ranges, without changing your point of aim (I.e. always aim at the centre of the cross). If you have a 100 meter zero then shoot at it from 300m, 400m.
Two variables will become immediately apparent.
First you will see what your drops really are compared to how they are calculated in your ballistic solver. This information will allow you to tune your MV (or BC if you are that way inclined) so that you have a really good understanding of your elevation adjustments. At least three data sets for this - 5 shot zero, then two groups of five shots at increasing range. It gets better the more groups you have but you have to be pragmatic.
Secondly you will see what your groups’ dispersion is like. This can be anything from really tight to quite alarming, but you really need to know before you go and shoot at animals. If you are getting a much wider dispersion then you are expecting at say 400m, then you need to work out why and get it under control. I think most of us older guys have seen some pretty funky stuff happening downrange that leads to much head scratching. Like if it’s on at 100 why is it like a shotgun at 400, etc.
Most of the suggestions of your realistic range are reasonable (some are probably a bit high) but entirely unproven with your setup of course. Believe me you will feel much much more confident shooting at range if you have proven to yourself that you are both accurate & precise at that range.