Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Shorter Barrel 223 data

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    5,273

    Shorter Barrel 223 data

    Hello Folks

    I recently changed from an 17.75"/450mm Bergara B14 EH stainless barrel to a Bergara B14 St chrome moly barrel at 16.5"/420mm, both in 223.

    The 16.5 is still being worked up but initial velocities are very interesting (to me at least!) when compared with the 18" (nominal) given that I have some direct comparisons, with more to come. Most samples are 10 rounds.

    Fiocchi Factory (Red box) 55gn 16.5" 3030fps 18" 2982 (cool day) 3020 (hot day) fps
    Sako 55gn. 16.5 2990 fps 18" 2984fps
    ADI 62 gn. 16.5 2857fps 18" 2848fps

    I'm not looking at this from the perspective of maximum speed, rather that two otherwise pretty much identically made barrels from the same company can be different!

  2. #2
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    I was having a play with quickload this afternoon to compare some potential powders. 16 inch barrel vs 18 inch (gimp's load). Something I noted was quickload had 97.3% propellent burn in the 16" for 2206h. Probably why 16" is a common length for AR-15 variants.

  3. #3
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    @Hahn which load of mine?


    I have a lot of data from various 16 & 18 inch 223 barrels with different loads, there can be significant variance within a barrel length - 100fps less between a factory new production 700 barrel at 18" vs my 18" cut rifled barrel with the same load for example

    The factory Remington barrel shoots extremely well however

  4. #4
    Member Rock river arms hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    2,232
    @Hahn

    It really depends on the gas system too.

    Rifle length, mid length, carbine length or pistol length gas systems.

    14.5" was another common length too but alas no more.
    @Tentman I do recall looking at 223 data and it showed in the heavier bullet weights especially like 62+ that gppd old 2208 gave better fps than 2206H

  5. #5
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    2208 is compressed usually with heavier bullets to get good speed which is a slight pain

  6. #6
    Member Rock river arms hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    2,232
    I've also been warned Gimp that for the heavier bullets using 2208 you need a longer barrel too? I've never reloaded for 223 when I had one but when i get another one I will reload for it

  7. #7
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    2208 works fine from 18 inch and does give similar, sometimes better, speed compared to 2206H

  8. #8
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    @gimp I found your load in the 223 thread for an 18" barrel, 25gr 2208 with 80eldms for 2800fps. @Rock river arms hunter Interestingly QL shows 2206h as faster and more efficient than 2208. I haven't found QL that accurate with my current loads but it gets me into the ballpark.

  9. #9
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    Ah yep, I am now using 24gr of 2206H, although that may change as I finish up an old 500gm container of 06H and begin using a new 4KG

  10. #10
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    That seems mild compared to your 2208 load. Are you still going 2800fps?

  11. #11
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Rock river arms hunter View Post
    I've also been warned Gimp that for the heavier bullets using 2208 you need a longer barrel too? I've never reloaded for 223 when I had one but when i get another one I will reload for it
    The only thing I can see changing with length is amount of propellant burnt. So I guess in theory the best powder for a given projectile in a long barrel will also work best in a short barrel.

  12. #12
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    Quote Originally Posted by Hahn View Post
    That seems mild compared to your 2208 load. Are you still going 2800fps?

    Nah 2700 average, it doesn't make any difference. Both loads are at or around book max, although with a longer OAL so pressure should be lower, in theory. No pressure problems with either anyway
    Micky Duck likes this.

  13. #13
    Member Hahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    264
    Yeah I see at 67mm oal you have another 8700ish psi before QL max. Could go to 25gr 99% full case and still be under 62000psi. 98% burn. Probably no real world advantage as you say though.

  14. #14
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,552
    I may increase the charge weight slightly to increase my effective range (range at which projectile retains >1800fps) once I open my new shiny 4kg jug - however I also have other rifles with which I can shoot deer at 400+ m so it doesn't really make any difference
    Micky Duck likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Tentman View Post
    Hello Folks

    I recently changed from an 17.75"/450mm Bergara B14 EH stainless barrel to a Bergara B14 St chrome moly barrel at 16.5"/420mm, both in 223.

    The 16.5 is still being worked up but initial velocities are very interesting (to me at least!) when compared with the 18" (nominal) given that I have some direct comparisons, with more to come. Most samples are 10 rounds.

    Fiocchi Factory (Red box) 55gn 16.5" 3030fps 18" 2982 (cool day) 3020 (hot day) fps
    Sako 55gn. 16.5 2990 fps 18" 2984fps
    ADI 62 gn. 16.5 2857fps 18" 2848fps

    I'm not looking at this from the perspective of maximum speed, rather that two otherwise pretty much identically made barrels from the same company can be different!
    Greetings,
    You would expect a difference of around 30 fps between the two barrels with the longer one the faster all else being equal. All else is seldom equal though. The round count, if known, would be interesting as would has either been chopped?
    GPM.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Myth? - shorter barrel = use faster powder?
    By Hermitage in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 01-08-2021, 05:45 PM
  2. 6.5 prc 28inch barrel load data
    By 300wsmPete in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25-08-2020, 10:24 PM
  3. 6.5x47 Short Barrel Data enquiry
    By quadhunter260 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-05-2020, 06:26 PM
  4. Shorter barrel = less velocity?
    By XBoltstalker in forum Shooting
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 22-09-2016, 06:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!