Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 27
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Shorter Barrel 223 data

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Tentman View Post
    Hello Folks

    I recently changed from an 17.75"/450mm Bergara B14 EH stainless barrel to a Bergara B14 St chrome moly barrel at 16.5"/420mm, both in 223.

    The 16.5 is still being worked up but initial velocities are very interesting (to me at least!) when compared with the 18" (nominal) given that I have some direct comparisons, with more to come. Most samples are 10 rounds.

    Fiocchi Factory (Red box) 55gn 16.5" 3030fps 18" 2982 (cool day) 3020 (hot day) fps
    Sako 55gn. 16.5 2990 fps 18" 2984fps
    ADI 62 gn. 16.5 2857fps 18" 2848fps

    I'm not looking at this from the perspective of maximum speed, rather that two otherwise pretty much identically made barrels from the same company can be different!
    Greetings,
    You would expect a difference of around 30 fps between the two barrels with the longer one the faster all else being equal. All else is seldom equal though. The round count, if known, would be interesting as would has either been chopped?
    GPM.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Invervegas
    Posts
    5,587
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings,
    You would expect a difference of around 30 fps between the two barrels with the longer one the faster all else being equal. All else is seldom equal though. The round count, if known, would be interesting as would has either been chopped?
    GPM.
    The shorter barrel is brand new, round count is currently 50. The round count on the longer barrel is about 400 (although some of the recorded velocities go back to its "break in" period).

    Im thinking of now running a test on the new short barrel to see if the accuracy improves over its break in. I was thinking to load 100 rounds of cheaper components. Shoot a 10 shot group. 10 also of factory as a control. Blast off 20 rounds at gongs/hares etc. Shoot the 10 round tests again. Blast off 20. Test 10. Blast off 20, test 10. This would take the barrel to just over 200 rounds, which is when "the internet" says it should be fully broken in and shooting at its best (for a cheaper factory grade barrel). Thoughts on this guys?
    Last edited by Tentman; 04-10-2024 at 11:23 AM.

  3. #3
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,874
    Quote Originally Posted by Tentman View Post
    The shorter barrel is brand new, round count is currently 50. The round count on the longer barrel is about 400 (although some of the recorded velocities go back to its "break in" period).

    Im thinking of now running a test on the new short barrel to see if the accuracy improves over its break in. I was thinking to load 100 rounds of cheaper components. Shoot a 10 shot group. 10 also of factory as a control. Blast off 20 rounds at gongs/hares etc. Shoot the 10 round tests again. Blast off 20. Test 10. Blast off 20, test 10. This would take the barrel to just over 200 rounds, which is when "the internet" says it should be fully broken in and shooting at its best (for a cheaper factory grade barrel). Thoughts on this guys?

    Given that bullet-barrel interactions are only one part of the puzzle of dispersion, and bullet quality is another part - possibly larger - this test may not demonstrate anything as far as "testing if accuracy improves"


    To see a difference (improvement) in precision of the order that you might reasonably expect (0 - 10 % change in mean radius?) from barrel "break in changes", you'd likely need massive sample sizes to have confidence in the result even if you used good quality bullets and ammunition. What you might demonstrate is that there is no meaningful difference that can be established, so people shouldn't worry about it
    Micky Duck likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Myth? - shorter barrel = use faster powder?
    By Hermitage in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 01-08-2021, 05:45 PM
  2. 6.5 prc 28inch barrel load data
    By 300wsmPete in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 25-08-2020, 10:24 PM
  3. 6.5x47 Short Barrel Data enquiry
    By quadhunter260 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25-05-2020, 06:26 PM
  4. Shorter barrel = less velocity?
    By XBoltstalker in forum Shooting
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 22-09-2016, 06:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!