Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Gunworks


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 172
Like Tree239Likes

Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Threaded View

  1. #11
    STC
    STC is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Location
    South
    Posts
    796
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    4x 5rd groups actually.


    Barrel cooled between 5rd groups (even though it doesn't actually matter), fired each load alternately to minimise any differences in fouling etc. Fired 10rd of each then went and did other stuff (helping others sort guns) for a couple of hours then fired the last 10 of each. Wind very low and consistent, <1ms 12 o'clock. Temperature consistent at 12 degrees C through the day (kestrel). Parallax dialled out.

    Shooting high numbers of shots through other rifles with different loads clearly demonstrates differences in precision, e.g. .223 with handloads 0.9moa group for 20, 1.5moa for 20 with factory "match" ammunition.


    How do you propose to quantify a valid understanding of the real precision capability of a system?
    Barrel cooling does matter, as do plenty of other factors, how much they matter? that is not exactly known. Getting up and changing your shooting posture, has an impact. Parallax dialled out will minimize parallax, not eleminate it completely. fouling can change things too. All minor effects, that generally are not too important when dealing with general hunting precision requirements. But when you are looking at 0.25 or 0.5 moa differences, these minor influences do start to matter. Another thing is poi shift: since you fired all those shots into the same group you would not know if later 5 shot groups had a different poi, compared to earlier ones. So even if one of them was tighter to start with it would be hidden if any poi shift occured. Essentially any "signal" (if it is there) is hidden within other "noise", and thats why both of them show no significant difference.

    Not saying you are a bad shot or anything (you clearly are not!). Essentially what you did is try to "prove" that for 2 charge weights, both of which already shot very well in your rifle (for general hunting purposes) there would not be a difference, (despite 3 shot groups indicating that there would be) by introducing a many other factors uf unknown impact into the system.

    Your system here (rifle, loads, you) seems to give good (

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. A novel approach to Load Development
    By Puffin in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-08-2018, 11:36 AM
  3. General approach to powder selection for a new load
    By MGNZ in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-11-2017, 03:29 PM
  4. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM
  5. OCW Load Testing
    By The Bloke in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 20-08-2014, 09:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!