Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Gunworks


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 191
Like Tree268Likes

Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Te Awamutu
    Posts
    1,060
    Also, nothing wrong with your stats assuming you're picking the t-test for unequal variances. It's the appropriate test. Also I'm not an expert statistician but use enough of these sort of tests in my field that I can do this without running to an actual statistician. Agree with the visual depiction of the 95% CIs means more to most and arguably are more meaningful that a statistical test to derive a p-value.

    Despite me providing some samples sizes you would need to detect "statistically significant" difference between groups of different sizes. This is mostly an incorrect usage of p-values and power and is borderline meaningless other than an academic curiosity.

    I warn that the importance of statistical significance should be tempered with an understanding of the data and what a statistical test, and p-value means (note it's not actually what was taught in high school textbooks, nor many a 101 stats textbook).
    Also the fact that "significance" when we're talking stats doesn't mean "meaningful or important" nor my result is "correct".
    It's a bloody hard concept to understand and I'm not certain I understand p-values fully. However, If you are interested in understanding it more and learning how misunderstood and how pervasive the incorrect usage of p-values is I would suggest reading the 13 misconceptions about p values here: https://www.ohri.ca/newsroom/seminar...03,%202014.pdf
    And the delightfully named paper: The insignificance of statistical significance testing: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188120111.pdf
    Or a simple run down here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misuse_of_p-values

    In short make decisions on the observed effect, it is the most meaningful thing in your data. But understand with less samples the observed effect may be an extreme result on the basis of chance because of the variability of the data.
    Do not dismiss results because they are not "significantly different" nor should you accept results simply because they are "significant".
    Last edited by Makros; 04-07-2024 at 01:41 PM.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. A novel approach to Load Development
    By Puffin in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-08-2018, 11:36 AM
  3. General approach to powder selection for a new load
    By MGNZ in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-11-2017, 03:29 PM
  4. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM
  5. OCW Load Testing
    By The Bloke in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 20-08-2014, 09:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!