Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Originally Posted by gimp

Which seating depth would you pick as the worst? Clearly got some votes for 1.861" CBTO as the best.

10 rd each of 2 best/2 worst

or 20rd each of best, worst ?

I'm leaning towards the latter as 10rd groups should be expected to vary in size by + or - 40% from the average, and the MR will be less accurate than a 20rd measurement

Let’s get some close to solid data then. 20 each of the worst and best. Use the longest length load as the worst.
I’ve been wanting to do this for ages but I just can’t find the time with two little terrors ruling my existence.