Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Ammo Direct


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 191
Like Tree268Likes

Thread: Testing a conventional approach to load development

Threaded View

  1. #25
    Member Ground Control's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia / Marlborough Sounds
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post



    So conclusion - with this rifle, bullet, brass, powder and shooter combination it is not possible to identify any difference in precision between loads with different seating depths by testing with 3 shot groups, at .003 inch increments of seating depth (as recommended by Erik Cortina, if he isn't the person to listen to for this then who is ?). Or 20rd groups of same.
    First off I’d like to say this is super interesting and “ good on ya “ for going to the effort to both conduct these tests and to document them so thoroughly

    I’m doing some load development at the moment for my 6.5CM with Sierra 130gr TMK projectiles.

    So my initial test is always for Powder charge weight ( using 2209 powder ) with the projectile approximately 45 thou off the lands . I use the word approximately because I have yet to use / find a method that is spot on accurate when measuring throat length .
    Starting at 1.0 gr below Sierra’s listed max charge I loaded up 6 rounds of each powder charge going up in 0.5gr increments ending up 0.5gr over their recommended max .
    I shot those rounds and experienced zero pressure signs , all shot acceptable groups ( below 25mm at 100 yrds ) with an apparent improvement as the charge weight increased . All of this means “ Diddly Squat “ in the grand scheme of things but I wanted to find my upper limit of safe powder charge .
    Now I have just loaded up another batch of loads using my chosen powder charge but with a selection of different seating depths. I make 10 thou increases in CBTO length.
    So now in theory I am going to test 45 thou / 35 thou / 25 thou / 15 thou jump to see if things tighten or loosen as the seating depth changes.
    I can’t understand why anyone would F*#k around with 3 thou changes , maybe in the world of Benchrest / F Class , but not in the world of Hunting / Factory barrels.
    This seating depth test is just to see if there is an obvious trend developing either good or bad and then and only then will I load a decent amount of the chosen brew and shoot multiple 10 shot groups .
    Last edited by Ground Control; 27-04-2025 at 04:29 PM.
    FALL IN LOVE WITH THE NUMBERS , NOT THE IDEA

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. A novel approach to Load Development
    By Puffin in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16-08-2018, 11:36 AM
  3. General approach to powder selection for a new load
    By MGNZ in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 28-11-2017, 03:29 PM
  4. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM
  5. OCW Load Testing
    By The Bloke in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 20-08-2014, 09:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!