The thing with QL is the rifle is not taken into account. It is simply a model based on case, powder and projectile specifics. The rifle has nothing to do with it. It is just a prediction. As I understand it though if you measure as many of those variables and measure what comes out the end (speed which accounts for rifle variables) then you can get an indication of the pressure required to reach said speeds... Like @Beavis's example. QL suggests he should only need 24.4gr 2206H to reach his 2864fps from a 16" barrel with all else being equal. This is at a predicted 65,000psi. But because, I am guessing, his rifle variables, he needs an extra grain and a half of powder to reach said speeds.
If you really wanted to get pedantic with case capacity, you can measure and change those variables in QL but I dont have the time or energy to do it. Your reloading practice should always air on the side of cation and allow for a worse case but starting low and working up. Again QL is only indicative but if you play with it enough you will figure out which variables are the one that have the greatest effect on speed and pressure. My observations are that seating depth, especially on magnums and anything over bore, plays a lesser role...
All I will say is that I would be bloody careful about picking and choosing the results you use and which you dont. I dont believe you can get money for nothing with gun powder, so if you are getting super speeds then it is likely due to there being enough pressure there to push the bullet that fast; and if QL suggests that that pressure is 10k or 15kpsi I will be bloody worried...
And the whole point I am arguing is exactly that, there are no free lunches.
Bookmarks