He's stuck in the hills getting a wet arse Rushy. I have a video I took today of some long range hares shot with the .22 but I might leave it to your imagination cause you might not see them with those old eyes.
Printable View
He's stuck in the hills getting a wet arse Rushy. I have a video I took today of some long range hares shot with the .22 but I might leave it to your imagination cause you might not see them with those old eyes.
The last one seen was hit and killed at this range with the .22
http://s1202.photobucket.com/user/fl...06868.mp4.html
nice one. may i suggest an hmr?
shooting things at 100 with an hmr is roughly the same as shooting things at 30m with a 22 on the difficultly scale. Taking shots like that at 100+ with the 22 are roughly as difficult at say a 300m target if you catch my drift.
I here you smidey but i'm not forking out for another rifle yet.
The hare that was shot in the video was found here and shot from the top of that fence line.
Attachment 41833
Are you eating any of the small game Dundee ?
They make excellent casseroles
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
For close to the same cost in ammo as a 223 why would you bother with a hmr?
12039767_1210162818999510_335671932952693562_n.jpg Photo by flour2 | Photobucket
@Dundee nice to see you have other interests than just hunting and fishing.
Yeah 17hmr open up fast alright, but in my experience the 17 grain round only destroys the head/neck with a good shot even if front on. .223 tends to destroy everything in the flight path of the bullet. I.e a frontal shot results in rabbit fertiliser :sick:
Did ya see the dog @300CALMAN ?
:wtfsmilie:
What dog @Dundee ???