Thread: Forestry security Ashley forest

Firstly, I read what you posted and it was clear that you were incorrect.... I don't have to establish your point you do.. and you don't just get to do that with a copy and paste and an inadequate reading of the law..

So how about you identify the particular wording that allows the destruction of a dog without either domestic stock being involved or protected wildlife.. or in the other provisions of the act, attacking people.... and when you fail to be able to do so perhaps you can retract your initial post instead of taking a position....

Originally Posted by Kiwi Sapper

I have provided cut and pastes from the Dog Control Act, and here is a link to the complete Act.

Dog Control Act 1996 No 13 (as at 03 September 2007), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation

I invite you to read it and point out where, what I said, was at fault.