Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 88
Like Tree164Likes

Thread: Game Animal Council (GAC) to be scrapped by Conservation Minister?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    7

    Game Animal Council (GAC) to be scrapped by Conservation Minister?

    Looks like Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage is going all out to stuff New Zealand hunting as fast as she can. Never have I felt such utter disgust for this lot in parliament at present.


    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/natio...cid=spartandhp

    Thanks Rushy, link was corrupted, try this one
    Last edited by Simon Gibson; 14-08-2018 at 09:04 PM.

  2. #2
    OPCz Rushy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Nor West of Auckland on the true right of the Kaipara River
    Posts
    34,233
    Check the link Simon. I don't think it took me where you intended.
    BeeMan likes this.
    It takes 43 muscle's to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger pull.
    What more do we need? If we are above ground and breathing the rest is up to us!
    Rule 1: Treat every firearm as loaded
    Rule 2: Always point firearms in a safe direction
    Rule 3: Load a firearm only when ready to fire
    Rule 4: Identify your target beyond all doubt
    Rule 5: Check your firing zone
    Rule 6: Store firearms and ammunition safely
    Rule 7: Avoid alcohol and drugs when handling firearms

  3. #3
    Member cambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    2,154
    https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/natio...y-under-review


    Anyone really surprised though?
    When the GC are in conflict with DoC's 1080 and game animal management plans, who thought DoC/Govt would really play fairly?
    Life is natures way of keeping meat fresh

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    4,024
    That sucks looks as if the minister is all for getting rid of our game animals any way it can and because the GAC questions the use of methods like 1080 it has to go. Just when we get a council that has our interest at heart the government is thinking of canning it …. we know who to vote for next time, and it won't be them.

  5. #5
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norf
    Posts
    5,755
    Arseholes !! But sadly predictable and no doubt the moron city/urban ignorant voting masses don’t give a shit or think it’s a good idea. After all we will be predator free won’t we. Totally arrogant bullshit

  6. #6
    Member scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    2,455
    Quote Originally Posted by cambo View Post
    https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/natio...y-under-review


    Anyone really surprised though?
    When the GC are in conflict with DoC's 1080 and game animal management plans, who thought DoC/Govt would really play fairly?
    no ...not surprised .... any elected government and their underlings listening to lobby groups that have a different view of how things could be done to their own agenda is just pipe dreams .... now if poor little paddles wandered off into an auckland city council park for a night of hunting native birds and accidently gnawed on some discarded 1080 maybe ..... ...

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Parahaki, Whangarei
    Posts
    1,274
    As usual - DOC bureaucrats protecting their jobs.
    And the Greens 'tail' wagging the composite Gov't.
    Where is NZ First (supposedly pro firearms and sportsmen/sports women)?
    The Greens agenda is to return NZ bush to pre-European occupation.
    The problem being that the Ecology of leaf browsers is gone (MOA for example), and deer/goats have filled that niche.
    Tussock land isn't being damaged by imported animals (numbers are too small), but uncontrolled sheep farming in the late 1800's/early 1900's did.
    The Fiordland environment isn't being destroyed by Wapiti, due to the excellent management practises of the FWF.
    The endangered list of NZ's native species is increasing, because the emphasis is on poisoning the environment, and therefore 'controlling/removing target feral species' - NOT.
    As usual, political agendas are more important than the will/knowledge of people who are waiting to be asked to help - hunters for example, and the impact out of date practises is having on the whole environment.
    After all, the Press/TV isn't interested in presenting a balanced, investigative opinion - except as a page filler - because balanced reporting doesn't sell papers/ increase viewer percentages.
    stagslayer 12, turtle and Cordite like this.

  8. #8
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norf
    Posts
    5,755
    The feral species that need removing are located in central Wellington
    tetawa, NZ_noddy, kotuku and 8 others like this.

  9. #9
    Member nelpop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Papamoa
    Posts
    185
    Not surprising. The small article in the latests NZ Hunter is also an interesting read. Kill them all, no herds of interest and bomb the country with 1080. Arrogance at its best.

  10. #10
    Member scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    waikato
    Posts
    2,455
    Quote Originally Posted by WallyR View Post
    The Greens agenda is to return NZ bush to pre-European occupation.
    The problem being that the Ecology of leaf browsers is gone
    ........ ummmm the greens are leaf browsers arent they?....................
    shit just realised .... get rid of other browsers and they will have no competition for feed..... thus bringing on an apocolyptic breeding season of green party members...... forget the beech mast and the battle for the birds something much more terrifying is coming......

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Christchuch New Zealand
    Posts
    6,078
    I always maintained the biggest danger to the enviroment is well meaning mis-informed greenies who think they know more than anyone else. (Why else would they support a poison that kills native birds and wildlife being spread by helicopter over the countryside.) The one thing I have noticed is that everywhere I have been that has seen the green rain has been silent. No birds, no insects nothing. Just silence. It kills every creature indiscriminately.

  12. #12
    Member Cordite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NZ Mainland (Dunedin)
    Posts
    5,527
    1080 appears kinder on the poisoners' consciences - like using Predator drones to kill at a great distance.

    That is, until they wake one morning at 1 am and really think about it.
    timattalon likes this.
    An itch ... is ... a desire to scratch

  13. #13
    Member Pengy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Up in da hills somewhere near Nelson
    Posts
    9,751
    If the argument for pre European settlement is to hold any water, then Trout and non native Pines would also be on the hit list.
    Their thinking is warped in the extreme
    headcase, Beavis, JoshC and 5 others like this.
    Forgotmaboltagain+1

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    2,326
    This is stressing me out, feel pretty helpless. What is there that we can actually do?

    The frustrating thing is the amount of hunters we have in NZ with no bite/voice.

  15. #15
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,474
    Quote Originally Posted by hotsoup View Post
    This is stressing me out, feel pretty helpless. What is there that we can actually do?

    The frustrating thing is the amount of hunters we have in NZ with no bite/voice.
    We (hunters) for the most part seem to be quite emotive and quite rough around the edges. To try and pull all of the hunters together as a united front always seems to end in internal rows. A lot of us don't/can't put our words into constructive sentences and resort to name calling and insults. This is one reason why we fail to be heard. Just my thoughts on it anyway.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 31-05-2016, 07:42 AM
  2. Game animal council
    By moonhunt in forum Hunting
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 30-12-2013, 08:03 PM
  3. NSW Game council's submission on use of FA Moderators
    By Dead is better in forum Resource Library
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 07:07 PM
  4. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 17-04-2012, 10:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!