That may be the case but it is this mentality that sees cars drive past you without stopping while you bleed out on the road for fear of prosecution.
Printable View
hey jim i was first on the scene at an accident i tried to save the guy but couldnt does that make it my fault
No its not. But if you drove past without doing anything then the answer would be yes.
What he did was morally right. But was still a crime.
That's why they invented the appeals process.
He should appeal and see what the high court says. It's not over yet. How many times have convictions been overturned.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Just a note. He has a civil conviction not a criminal one.
I have met Dave several times and know and went to school with his son who is also a pilot.
Imo, if it happened again tomorrow he would do it all over again.
Salt of the earth bloke who always puts others first.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Imo he shpuld not have even been charged.
It is a waste of my money convicting him of a victimless crime and my money donating to defend him.
He can still appeal the sentence...
What a crock of shit
I don't have all the facts, and it is easy to talk now in retrospective. But if the westpac pilot fail to get there, could he not have jumped with them or at list taken the place of the copilot to show the direction, as it seems he was the only one who knew were to go?
Yes. My mistake. I used the wrong terminology but there you go, to the average Joe in the streets the difference is so subtle that they hear "convicted" and immediately associate / think "criminal".
Whatever, he deserves admiration and the expressed thanks of society.
Maybe you guys should get the CAA to look into this TV3 shit:thumbsup: we might get result where someone's gone and broken the law for all the wrong reasons, instead of this which to me looks like the right ones.