Printable View
I DON'T have a DOC permit nor am I getting one!.Quote:
Originally Posted by woods223
It was probably a stupid question but given I haven't needed to hunt on DOC land or obtain a permit for that matter due to where I do hunt I was clarifying that info. I inherited the rifle from my brother in law and that's how he has set it up. I've only shot it at the range so far and not during the hours of darkness.
For day light spotting in open country I don't think there is any harm in it, certainly a game changer for spotting game with the high end models. If anything it's annoying that they will soon become a must have an another very expensive piece of kit that everyone carry's around.
However the rifle scope versions for night shooting are definitely crossing the line and should not be used on DOC Land. To me thats definitely in the realm of pest control and not hunting.
They are a great tool for culling / getting meat but using them for trophy hunting on public land like a lot of guys do doesn’t sit right with me.
Agree wholeheartedly with this, was in the position of walking behind a mate in the Pureora(s - haha) who was wearing a faded blaze cam shirt. In the afternoon sunlight, passing through ferns - the colour fully matched the summer coat of a red hind and several times it had me going oi and getting my radar twitching. I grabbed the shirt off him and went for a walk holding it, and he was shocked - saw the same thing I did. I'll never touch faded blaze again that's for sure. It's already easy for bad calls to happen, you don't need to help them along when you don't need to.Quote:
Originally Posted by akaroa1
A danger is that thermals pick up indistinct heat signals, especially in scrub and bush. And the cheaper thermal spotters that will be mostly used (35mm/$2.5k types) have lower definition. Even in open country it can be difficult to clearly define what the heat source is. Shooting at these heat spots could be a disaster, and people will do it - you can bet on it. People will also be tempted to shoot at heat signals when shooting light is marginal - you can bet on that too.
It will be an absolute essential to check heat sources with good binos, or be absolutely certain through the thermal the shape is an animal. Using these on public land adds another level of risk to everyone. Ive previously seen poorly edited You Tube vids of these being used on DOC land by hoons. With drinking involved. It makes me uneasy.
The risk is less on private land because other people are less likely to be about - but there are no guarantees.
Since the eighties, in various scenarios, I have used night vision and in later years thermal devices. It takes a bit of practice/use to get your head around what you're looking at with some of the older gear but most of the modern stuff is pretty good. I carry around a basic Hikmicro LH15 a lot of the time for general spotting and even using that you can identify what you're looking at out to reasonable range. eg. deer,pigs, goats @ 350m+ which is probably further than most people should be shooting at night. Before anyone pipes up, all my night shooting is done in previously scouted areas with known background/backdrop. This gear is just another tool for effective pest control shooting, not sport hunting. my 2c worth. Now I'm off out to carry on another nights deer control.
These products are also extremely ripe for miss use. Combined with moderators, they provide added safety/ confidence too poachers and stock thieves.
Just the fact of clarifying their use on crown land won't change the fact that law breakers will use them for poaching etc though.Quote:
Originally Posted by whanahuia
A mates Uncle was shot dead in the Horomunga a few months ago by miss identified heat signature. I don't know a lot of details about it but there's certainly going to be an increased danger level.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahr
Heard of that when I was back in Rotorua last month, got no facts other than here say. Can't understand it wasn't big in the news
Here's the article from the herald. No real facts though. My understanding is there were 2 separate parties hunting ( most probably illegally at that time of the day although that's an assumption on my part) and one party picked up a heat blob in their thermal and shot it. Sadly it wasn't a deer.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/waikato-n...AUAAZGF5ZZ2UE/
FFS
People who shoot at unidentified heat signatures are also probably members of the groups that shoot at sound, movement or unidentified targets in general. They’re out there, just look at the numbers that get shot while wearing blaze clothing, a subject that gets a regular airing.
True. Though looking at it from a landowners perspective, and having had every excuse thrown my way. Its another out when you confront them. Before this they couldn't claim it was legal either side of the boundary fence.Quote:
Originally Posted by No.3
This was always a difficult one for Doc to enforce. When was the last time you've been stopped for a hunting permit check on Public Land? I was the other day for the first time. Didn't ask if I had a thermal (which I don't). Best be honing your bush hunting skills, and keeping your head low (in the hut or tent) at night.