Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Gunworks


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 190
Like Tree276Likes

Thread: Has 1080 by kill struck again

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,977
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    Did I mention poisoning deer with 1080? No, so your post is erroneous.

    I suggest you learn what science is before saying that that website represents science of 1080. Picking and choosing studies and not peer reviewing isn't science.
    That is complete bollocks Savage1. The website
    1080science.co.nz

    is administered by Dr J C Pollard, who has a PhD (doctorate in zoology. Her associated contributors are also highly qualified and experienced scientists and foresters.

    Parts of the site, including the ERMA index are faithful extracts from the ERMA review process. Another link is to the
    www.rarebits.co.nz
    site also constructed by Dr Pollard which contains specific very interesting report notes by Department of Conservation.

    Also on the 1080science.co.nz
    site has a link named "Appeals" which details the extreme reluctance by the PCE to hear evidence against 1080 poison from numerous New Zealanders.

    I would suggest that you are deliberately attempting to denigrate a qualified scientist and associated scientists, technicians and foresters, Department of Conservation science and the ERMA review science by inferring that only a narrow dictionary interpretations of what "science' is, is allowable on this forum or anywhere else , for that matter. If the forum applied your inferred rule of Peer review", is would cease to exist in every thread.
    You are also attempting to dissuade members of this forum from viewing one of the best independent science websites in this country.

    Shame on you.

    I suggest you think again and allow others their point of view. Nobody is perfect, including me, but people are entitled to valid opinion, thoughts and to present their evidence and entitled to discuss and learn. What you are attempting is to stultify that and in the course of your own posts are simply applying gross generalisations as a means of criticising others. It seems you have an interest in trying to have this thread discussion destroyed, and thereby depriving concerned members from fair exchanges of information and concerns.
    mucko, blake and screamO like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Over Kill
    By john m in forum Hunting
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 15-05-2014, 02:42 PM
  2. Dre's first kill
    By upnorth uplander in forum Varminting and Small Game Hunting
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-03-2014, 10:12 AM
  3. First bow kill
    By Toby in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 23-11-2013, 01:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!