No, there wouldnt be a major expansion of trapping or shooting, because man power is too expensive, and thats the bottom line.
The question and the only thing on the govts mind is: What is going to kill the most pests for X amount of dollars. And that is not and never will be trapping or shooting.
The only question asked here is if 1080 was discontinued, what is a cost effective alternative. And no one here has produced a solution.
Immediately when that question is asked, the anti-1080 crowd seem to take offence and think it is some personal attack on them and attack, abuse and try and put down others for asking the question.
No, it is a completely reasonable question to ask and one that needs to be answered before any change is made. In my opinion, it makes no difference if youve done your homework for 10 years or 10 minutes, if you cant come up with a cost effective method of pest control, 1080 in the eyes of the govt will go nowhere and all your homework is a waste of time.
No one here as said it isnt bad, of course it is bad, no poison is good, it isnt used just for the hell of it, it is used because it is needed to be used.
Its the same as the pesticide DDT, and it wasnt stopped worldwide until there was an alternative, and that is all anyone is asking for - an alternative to 1080 that is cost effective.
Bookmarks