Completely disagree re weight considderation
Its about strength and load baring when considdering packs i believe. Weight shouldnt be a gauge - unless you say can do everything the same.......
Ive tried a bunch of flimsy ligjt packs and reverted to smaller tough packs (only marginally heavier) and they have always come up trumps
Best i have opted for is the macpak ascent 70L narrow and sit high on your hips and i think the ass is woven kevlar so doesnt wear.
5 years down now and still no issue - alot of straps but allpws you to compressit easily for dau pack use also - one easy wearing tough mother
Addicted to gun powder
Depends what you want out of it, theres gunna be a trade off in durability in order to go light, but it isnt as big as you might think. modern materials have closed this gap.
Agreed about load bearing, which is why I chose the exped as it is rated very well there. Obviously you dont want to throw 25 kg of gear into a frameless UL pack. It carries weight better than the one it replaced which was 3 + KG.
Eventually I will drop some cash on a modular pack system like a stone glacier, so I can have my cakae and eat it too.
Mate im an imported gear whore
Still not sold on UL or L packs - if you ethically kill/butcher a red/fallow or haul a full tahr cape and head in a full kit bag and then tell me the UL gear is as tough, comfy, hard wearing and reliable id have to question your sanity
Ok for a day or two hunt but this dudes talking a 3-4 day hunt ie full expedition.
General UL or L gear, thats great love that but like boots i personally believe under investment for strength in a back is stupid - blow a strap out at 1000 with $5k plus worth of gear in it on dusk and youll see the light
Addicted to gun powder
Bookmarks