Thread: Kaimanawa Forest Park

Originally Posted by Ross Nolan

The land the trust and road are on were from purchases subsequent to the original gift of the summits- as your pdf. Are you saying the purchases should not stand?
If so, I sold a house in Birkenhead last century I'd quite like back, and I'd quite like to reexamine the sale of my great grandparents farm at Pirongia also

No, the way I read someone else’s post it seemed as though they were saying the part of TNP near the desert Rd was part of the land gifted to the “park”. I was just showing the land near desert Rd was acquired through other means.

So do we know who ordered the gates to be put in? There must have been some financial or budget approval for the installation of that gate?
Follow the money…

The money came from Shane Jones and the election bribe account (provincial growth fund), so in effect from you.
The details are laid out early in the thread in the HELISIKA/Trust agreement.
Essentially the PFF pays construction costs, helisika pays maintenance and operational costs over a 15 year period and the trust owns the buildings and improvements.

If he didnt see that other gate they might have been removed.

Maybe the gate is just a muck stirring exercise to get attention and maybe some Koha? It wouldn't be the first time...

They have already received 'koha' from the taxpayer to the tune of, (back of the fag packet calc) a million. Possibly a bit less.

Guys, guys, guys.....wait until the "T" word creeps into this debate. Treaty. And the "C" word...Co-governance. The last 23 pages of facts/opinions on this thread may well become redundant. If Maori sense they have been wronged in any way, and they can gain from that, they will go for redress. Watch this space.

Originally Posted by Ranger 888

Guys, guys, guys.....wait until the "T" word creeps into this debate. Treaty. And the "C" word...Co-governance. The last 23 pages of facts/opinions on this thread may well become redundant. If Maori sense they have been wronged in any way, and they can gain from that, they will go for redress. Watch this space.

Got anything constructive to say about the topic? Or do you just want to voice your prejudice.

Originally Posted by Tahr

Got anything constructive to say about the topic? Or do you just want to voice your prejudice.

I was being constructive, and voicing my freedom of speech, Tahr. I deal in reality, not prejudice.

Hi all
My enquiry to LINZ has been acknowledged and passed onto Crown Property to respond. Will pass on any news as received.
Cheers Ruger7mm

Originally Posted by Ruger7mm

Hi all
My enquiry to LINZ has been acknowledged and passed onto Crown Property to respond. Will pass on any news as received.
Cheers Ruger7mm

Is this where the Crown Property lease of that land parcel to the trust mysteriously emerges????

This was posted on a FB page

Sent from my CPH2145 using Tapatalk

Freedom of speech doesnt extend to inflammatory, divisive dogwhistling. Some statements are more an action of aggression than of persuasion or information. They can be called out for what they are.
There will be a variety of views among a forum like this but ethnic based ones will be a small minority.
Trough snouting help yourself adventurism has been indulged in by all at times.
A rules based legal system can be hard to fully comprehend (for me at least) but will give us a good result if pursued early and forcefully.

Dunno about that assumption : going back to certain firearms related enquiry. Transperancy should also be a requirement.

Originally Posted by Woody

Dunno about that assumption : going back to certain firearms related enquiry. Transperancy should also be a requirement.

And honesty, full and complete disclosure. Qualities very much lacking at present