So you didn't answer a single one of those questions, just tried sidestepping the obvious as most antis do.
1 - No one cares what the FBI rate the poison as, it's irrelevant.
2 - We have a unique situation situation in this country in regards to having virtually no native mammals, whether other countries use it or not is irrelevant, they aren't in the same situation.
3 - No shit, it's a poison, you could say the same about salt, sulphuric acid, petrol, cyanide etc. Once again, irrelevant.
4 - That's a very broad sweeping statement, I haven't looked into each of their cases, were their studies peer reviewed? Shown to be biased or inaccurate?
5 - Are you saying that no 'true' hunters support 1080? What defines a true hunter? Is it possible to be a 'true' hunter and a conservationist at the same time?
I didn't ask for any of that, I asked specific questions and you decided to regurgitate ignorant statements and ignored what I asked.
I don't know why I bother, we've both made up our minds.
Bookmarks