Thread: My first Hummel?

I shot a Red 20 years ago that had no balls, and had just bumps on his head. He was a big bodied animal though.

There was no scarring or anything, just a pizzle sans accoutrements.

Originally Posted by Ross Nolan

I shot a Red 20 years ago that had no balls, and had just bumps on his head. He was a big bodied animal though.

There was no scarring or anything, just a pizzle sans accoutrements.

That's what I thought a Hummel was (no antlers or balls), but the dictionary definition (above) seems different.

And this too. https://www.google.com/search?client...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8