My suggestion is not to take it personally.
I stand by my observations and do not see factory ammo as an excuse. A lot of rifle reviews I have seen, are done with reloads and factory ammo.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
My suggestion is not to take it personally.
I stand by my observations and do not see factory ammo as an excuse. A lot of rifle reviews I have seen, are done with reloads and factory ammo.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
No worries R93, if i had taken something personally i wouldn't have bothered to reply - just trying to show the other side of the argument.
If a base requirement of being a magazine writer was being an exceptional reloader and an exceptional shooter there there would be very few writers. Also in my experience, you simply don't get paid enough for articles to warrant going through a reasonable load development for a rifle. A bit different if you already have the reloading components and a range of suitable powders and projectiles on hand but otherwise the writer will have to pay for that out of their own pocket.
You cannot miss fast enough!
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GPREventsNZ
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/sgil045
Bookmarks