Thread: Role of the Game Animal Council

Barry,the trouble is ,as I see it.
if we bag the GAC as not wanted by hunters...we shoot ourselves in the foot....far better to try and get a better outcome from them,then to bag them and loose what little gains they are able to make on our behalf.
for years the hunting community has said we have no voice...well we have been given one..why not get in behind it and allow it to shout louder till we ARE HEARD and taken notice of.there are some really good people on there ,trying thier collective best to improve our lot.
its often said we hunters n shooter as a community are too quick to devide ourselves ,some even suggest others are put in way of a certain large people carrying automobile....be careful not to fall into same trap.
in places where we as a community have a good relationship with DOC...good field staff and office staff who know whats what..its great..that kind of relationship does everyone a whole lot of good..we need to foster it in all its shapes n forms.

all fair enough my concern is 1) for our dollar what are we getting i.e access -I follow Rec hunting closely - seen nothing on any format re any new access and 2 ) we do no need them to be warranted under that act - so what gains from them ??? they have been on forum promoting their hunting course hopefully they will reply or maybe not - if I saw real benefits I may feel differently but I dont