Thread: SPCA call out 1080 for what it is - good on you !!

Originally Posted by ethos

Whereas I see the SPCA statement as clear evidence a bunch of people don’t like widespread aerial 1080 for all sorts of reasons. The commonly run line that “it’s just self interested hunters” who don’t like it is flimsier than ever.
Go to SPCA Facebook page. A vast majority of feedback is positive to their stance. A skewed sample of the public? Maybe, but it’s not self interested hunters maybe they are just anti vaccers then eh, sure seem to be a lot of them....

Speaking as a GP, each pill my patients take have a reason for it, it's for condition "a" or condition "b" or condition "c", everything is justified. Blood pressure, stroke prevention, antihistamine. It's the same with all my patients, everything for its reason. But still I sometimes think, "what the hey!?!", when I open someone's chart and see he or she is on 15 different meds. At a certain critical mass, no matter how well justified every single item, you can't avoid the thought, "Surely, so many meds can't still be good?"

How many tons 1080 do we drop, everywhere, and...until 2050?

Originally Posted by Cordite

Speaking as a GP, each pill my patients take have a reason for it, it's for condition "a" or condition "b" or condition "c", everything is justified. Blood pressure, stroke prevention, antihistamine. It's the same with all my patients, everything for its reason. But still I sometimes think, "what the hey!?!", when I open someone's chart and see he or she is on 15 different meds. At a certain critical mass, no matter how well justified every single item, you can't avoid the thought, "Surely, so many meds can't still be good?"

How many tons 1080 do we drop, everywhere, and...until 2050?

Aerial 1080 would also fail the “first do no harm” test eh.
Be careful, with heresy like this, professionals are called anti nutters and anti vaccers.
It’s the science don’t you know..