Thread: Tahr foundation petition and court action

Originally Posted by R93

I agree.

I did hear a tidbit from the case and it is hearsay for now. But when presented to doc that businesses will suffer as a result of the cull they said "We don't care"

If this is proven true then we know what type of society they and the government want. It's fuckin scary.


Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

If this is true it’s a sad state of affairs when “we don’t care” is an appropriate defence in court, kind of like when you tell one of your kids off and they say “but she did it”.
As someone who has only found a real passion for tahr this year it would disappointing if this goes through. The introduced species defence is such bullshit they have been here 116 years. They are and should be forever part of our landscape

Originally Posted by Mr300WSM

If this is true it’s a sad state of affairs when “we don’t care” is an appropriate defence in court, kind of like when you tell one of your kids off and they say “but she did it”.
As someone who has only found a real passion for tahr this year it would disappointing if this goes through. The introduced species defence is such bullshit they have been here 116 years. They are and should be forever part of our landscape

Apparently the comment is public? I cant find anything and have spoken to people that should know and they dont. So not sure now if it was during the court case or some other venue that doc commented. Will try and find out more.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk