Printable View
Apparently the comment is public? I cant find anything and have spoken to people that should know and they dont. So not sure now if it was during the court case or some other venue that doc commented. Will try and find out more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr300WSM
Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
The statement that the judge "may announce his decision late Friday" is never a good sign. Govt's always announce bad news "late Friday pm" ?! GRRRRRRRR !
I had the opportunity to spear tackle her a few months ago at work.
But my boss and the hr person had a quiet word with me before her visit......
Let’s just hope the judge has some common sense because it sure is lacking in parliament at the momentQuote:
Originally Posted by chainsaw
My recollection from the judgement that was delivered in the LNIRDF vs DoC case was that while DoC weren't completely thrashed from a legal perspective, the comments as to their conduct certainly weren't flattering.........kinda expect something similar this time too, so those leading the charge on our behalf are hopefully anticipating that, and have a plan to exploit any negative observations.
DoC's lemon sucking attitude that no non native flora and fauna should exist in national parks is grossly bigoted nonesence IMHO because if their fanatical stupidy was carried through "broadbrush" there would be no trout or salmon or mallard duck, canada geese, or human beings either for that matter. All ski lodges, chairlifts, doc huts and tracks should also be removed. Tahr hunters frequent areas very seldom traversed by "DoC's tourists. The obsessed waste of the Tahr resource is pathetic pc incompetence leading to unbridled wasteful slaughter and very narrow minded.
no weeds either....
Just saw an add for the project On tv3 At 7 they have the tahr story on Tonight be interesting to see what there take is
Should have known better to think it would be a good story. It’s good to get it out there in the public but for that “dick head” host at the end to say he is on the side of the native plants and IF they are eating them. How about you find out all the facts before u open your gob.
Yes. He is very "religious"
Note the comment from Tahr foundation spokesperson, that DoC notified at midnight submissions could be made snd then closed the submission time allowed to only 48 hours. Dirty dirty dirty baggages.
It was rubbish heaps of footage of tahr motoring around filmed/chased by helicopters.
No real facts,nothing to make people think wow what neat animals.
No mention under threat in Himalayas.
Spokesperson from Tahr Foundation did her best but they had her on a skype/zoom call poor definition no real intro.
Watched it, coulda been worse.
Also coulda been a whole lot better.
But on the whole not TOO negative about tahr.
The DoC farcical public submission process clearly EXEMPLIFIES the disdain NZ Government Agencies, their staff and the NZ Parliamentary Ministers ( in this instance E. Sage) for New Zealanders and democratic fair play. The government obviously regards it's own citizens as no more than plebescite ants to be stood upon. DoC appears in this light to be a security threat to New Zealanders way of life.
What are you going to do about it "Miss transparent Prime Ministeress"? And you Mr Muller fulla; and you G Generale?
Oh of course, how silly would one actually be to assume you would do any bloodything at all ay.
https://www.odt.co.nz/rural-life/rur...%99-west-coast
Few articles coming out about deer numbers lately. Guess “awareness” is being increased to help justify future reductions of the next introduced species.
Before i went down south this year i contacted a few Doc offices and none of them could give me animal numbers in general areas. In fact they were bloody useless with general info when it come to hunting