Thread: Thar extermination

Originally Posted by kiwijames

Ms Sage has picked a few fights this week. She has recently drafted a sloppy bill around fresh water fish. This has not gone down well with anglers as it leaves big holes around F&G management and Treaty settlements.
The response from anglers does appear a LOT more sophisticated. Sir Geoffrey Palmer has drafted an insightful evaluation and anglers are making, on the whole, intelligent submissions.
Hunters are almost embarrassing in comparison. Like we dont deserve to be heard. From the ability to link EVERYTHING to a 1080 conspiracy, whinging overemotive nonsense, using near unintelligible social media comments placed with stupid threats and innuendo. We sound like the Neanderthals some want to portray us as.
IF your going to reply, think first. Ask someone to assist you if you need (Davey Hughes and Black watch put some good stuff on Facebook) and sound like someone who should be listened too.

The sad fact of the matter is the hunter democratic are generally not littericy scholars myself included,my typing generally confuses spell check, I use punctuation badly if at all,Even I struggle to read my handwriting let alone anybody else.
That doest make my or anybody elses opinion less correct or less valid just because we cant speak politician speak.

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

The sad fact of the matter is the hunter democratic are generally not littericy scholars myself included,my typing generally confuses spell check, I use punctuation badly if at all,Even I struggle to read my handwriting let alone anybody else.
That doest make my or anybody elses opinion less correct or less valid just because we cant speak politician speak.

I have been in contact with the Game animal Council since July. They are now looking to appoint a person to act as liaison to act for them in a paid position. Bearing VC's comments in mind would Peter Dunn be the right person, considering he moved the Bill establishing the GAC ?.

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

The sad fact of the matter is the hunter democratic are generally not littericy scholars myself included,my typing generally confuses spell check, I use punctuation badly if at all,Even I struggle to read my handwriting let alone anybody else.
That doest make my or anybody elses opinion less correct or less valid just because we cant speak politician speak.

It doesn't make your submission any less valid. It just makes it fair easier to take it less seriously.

Sent from my TA-1024 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

The sad fact of the matter is the hunter democratic are generally not littericy scholars myself included,my typing generally confuses spell check, I use punctuation badly if at all,Even I struggle to read my handwriting let alone anybody else.
That doest make my or anybody elses opinion less correct or less valid just because we cant speak politician speak.

@veitnamcam

Typos and perfect grammar are irrelevant as long as we're respectful and polite. I think that's the main point.

If someone is a proud snob picking on others' grammar THEY have the bigger problem.