Mate that site isn't science. It's opinions with references to studies. I've read plenty on there.
She makes good points, but often attributes correlation as causation, and makes ideological leaps of faith. You have to understand it is just one person's opinion.
If you read the references often they don't even support the argument she is making.
It's always good to question and review but you are only looking at the issue from one perspective. There are a platitude of resources to read and plenty of scientific findings to base your opinion on.
That site is the anti 1080 equivalent of the doc articles. Reference what's useful disgard the rest.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Bookmarks