Thread: Warning Distressing and Disturbing Photographs- 1080 Poison

Originally Posted by Nick-D

Mate that site isn't science. It's opinions with references to studies. I've read plenty on there.

She makes good points, but often attributes correlation as causation, and makes ideological leaps of faith. You have to understand it is just one person's opinion.

If you read the references often they don't even support the argument she is making.

It's always good to question and review but you are only looking at the issue from one perspective. There are a platitude of resources to read and plenty of scientific findings to base your opinion on.

That site is the anti 1080 equivalent of the doc articles. Reference what's useful disgard the rest.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

Not true. A very large amount of the data, especially in the index section is derived directly from DoC's own science, plus Landcare Research , some of which had never been made available to the public. Of course, we know it is in the interests of the establishment and the twig and tweeters to try to decry this valuable information base (probably the best in NZ) because it is comprehensive and honest.