Thread: We could have been hunting under level 4 afterall

Originally Posted by possum_shooter

Ffs there are some people on here who felt they have been fucken robbed or something. What a pack of self centred wa****ers. I think the government did very well in these new and challenging times. Did they get very decision right? No they didn't but they did a bloody good job of keeping it under control. Sounds like a lot of you seem to think the way we should have gone is the way the US and Trump have gone. They are going to have people dying for months yet.
We only had to miss out on 6 weeks hunting, boo fucken hoo, think about the old people in hospital dying alone, the old people in rest homes who are locked in there rooms and not seen their or friends or famiily for the last 6 weeks. Would you be taking the same stance if it had ripped throunh NZ and killed a few of your family members?

Out of Curiosity, what is the threshold for you for a situation that it is permissible for the Government, and its police, to not be bound by its own laws?

Because those people who appeared before the select committee, who could not be with their dying family, or had a miscarriage alone, were also illegally separated from their loved ones.

I didn't five a flying fuck about hunting, what I cared about was during the level 4 lock-down my mother, who suffers from terrible anxiety and depression, was isolated from her family because she wasn't allowed to be visited due to keeping bubbles separated, by her family, none of whom were sick, and she deteriorated and ended up self harming, when it was not illegal for me to go over after work each day to have a cuppa with her, like I normally do, no all the doom and gloom made her feel like she as a fucking liability.

I still wasn't allow to see her until level 3