Thread: What calibre

Also check out how much the ammo is, not just about calibre you also need to see how much it will cost to feed the beast! Bets prices i have gotten for ammo is at the outdoorsman in roto vegas, good bunch of buggers in there and prices are fantastic for hornady sst's

Originally Posted by Beetroot

Pick one of these in a Tikka stainless and everyone will think you...

...are a boring fart with no taste?

Originally Posted by hawkfish

this has probably been asked before

Doubtful

Originally Posted by mucko

no mufflers on mine mate, hunter308 can bring his 270 down its like a fucking howitzer.

Just how I like em @mucko loud and bloody proud and that is only 51.5gr of H4350 in the case too

That's not much. 140s or 150s?

Originally Posted by gimp

That's not much. 140s or 150s?

130's doing 2850fps from a 24 inch barrel and under an inch 53.5 grains will get me one inch grouping and 50fps short of 3000fps if I go any higher with the charge then groups open up to an unsatisfactory sizing, going to be trying out a slower powder for it once the 4350 I have runs out but will be trying some 140's on it too before then.

7.62×39×270 ?

"Yawn" . Another case of someone who has been brain washed into thinking bigger is best lol. Its horses for courses. If bush stalking or shooting within 200m a 243 is PLENTY of fire power for any Red in NZ. I havnt lost one deer or pig yet with my 243 after being hit with in 0-200m with good ammo. Unless you doing longer range shooting every now and again theres no need to even think about changing to a "bigger" calbre. A 243 will still knock over game at 300m -400m if need be but if you shooting more than 200m a reasonable percentage of the time then i would recommend going to something like a 308 as its a fact that something like that performs better at the longer rangers than a 243.
But if 95 pcent of your shooting is 0-180m etc i have found the 243 will drop anything no prob and seems to be even better than the BIG Bangers as lots of hunters think because they using a cannon just getting it on and pulling the trigger it they drop the animal.
Have mates that use a 308, 3006, 270 and they all have shot deer in the past within 200m and they all have stories of the one that got away, or have run a fair distance after being it. never had a deer run more than 50yards ever if hit with my 243 at a reasonable distance,

Originally Posted by hawkfish

Ive used a whole host of calibres and Im not worried about a bit more recoil. The 30-06 ticks all the boxes as far as being a good alrounder is concerned but I just wondered what was the most popular calibre out there? Or isnt there one and its just a case of pick one out of the usual suspects? 308, 270, 30-06, 6.5 etc

The 6.5 calibre has had a huge resurgence around this area .
The common projectile been the 6.5 amax with its high bc and sd with its spectacular stopping power.
Any chambering of the 3 6.5x55 .260 or 6.5 284.
The mighty tikka is chambered 6.5x55 and 260.
Minimal recoil and inherently accurate with ammo commonly available and affordable for the 6.5x55.

Originally Posted by deer243

"Yawn" . Another case of someone who has been brain washed into thinking bigger is best lol. Its horses for courses. If bush stalking or shooting within 200m a 243 is PLENTY of fire power for any Red in NZ. I havnt lost one deer or pig yet with my 243 after being hit with in 0-200m with good ammo. Unless you doing longer range shooting every now and again theres no need to even think about changing to a "bigger" calbre. A 243 will still knock over game at 300m -400m if need be but if you shooting more than 200m a reasonable percentage of the time then i would recommend going to something like a 308 as its a fact that something like that performs better at the longer rangers than a 243.
But if 95 pcent of your shooting is 0-180m etc i have found the 243 will drop anything no prob and seems to be even better than the BIG Bangers as lots of hunters think because they using a cannon just getting it on and pulling the trigger it they drop the animal.
Have mates that use a 308, 3006, 270 and they all have shot deer in the past within 200m and they all have stories of the one that got away, or have run a fair distance after being it. never had a deer run more than 50yards ever if hit with my 243 at a reasonable distance,

When youve got a little one all ya want is a bigger one!
Apparently

Originally Posted by andyanimal31

When youve got a little one all ya want is a bigger one!
Apparently

And savagely defend the abilities of little ones!

Originally Posted by Spudattack

And savagely defend the abilities of little ones!

The best thing about small ones apparently,
Theres no hole they wont fit in!

Originally Posted by andyanimal31

The best thing about small ones apparently,
Theres no hole they wont fit in!

Taihape motto?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by BRADS

Taihape motto?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Na, just mine!

Originally Posted by BRADS

Taihape motto?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by deer243

you shooting more than 200m a reasonable percentage of the time then i would recommend going to something like a 308 as its a fact that something like that performs better at the longer rangers than a 243.

Nah, .243 is an excellent long range cartridge if you have the right rifle (1:9" or faster twist) and load it correctly (stuff case to the brim with slow burning powder with a 105-115gr bullet on top)