Thread: YouTube star "Rogee" the great New Zealand hunting 'n' shooting ambassador.

Plenty of us have had hunts that haven’t gone well or shots on animals we’ve been less impressed about however it’s when hunting videos are posted online that show animals being wounded that I don’t appreciate.

Does footage of an animal that’s been poorly shot need to be posted or can that be left out of the final footage? Did that young bull need to be shot?

I would agree that the whole video gives an honest account of his trip however videos on YouTube are accessible by everyone, both hunters and non hunters alike.

As a hunter I don’t appreciate seeing footage of a wounded animal… I wonder how a non hunter views that same footage!

Rogee is also representing a number of companies for which he’s sponsored by so his content needs to reflect a positive image, he’s also a hunter making videos which also represents hunters, his content helps set a bench mark of what is and what isn’t acceptable just like all other hunting videos out on the net.

On a side note, I sometimes wonder if there’s too much pressure on YouTubers to produce content so they push boundaries or take the shot all for the sake of the video.