14Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksBad experience can come from wounding an animal with to smaller caliber aswell that may put her off for life. A deer culler can say after shooting a couple thousand animals that 223 is enough gun for deer and it is, but in inexperienced hands a few inches makes a difference. My choice would be the 243 for the reasons stated above and I have never felt recoil worth talking about from any 243 ive shot and that a few. Ik not bagging the 223 its a great round but not acceptable for someones first animal in my opinion.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.
Search Forums
User Tag List
Results 1 to 15 of 28
Thread: .223 vs .243 please.
Threaded View
-
24-12-2012, 06:11 PM #16Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Galatea
- Posts
- 1,099
Re: .223 vs .243 please.
Reply With QuoteTags for this Thread
- .22,
- .22mag,
- .243,
- .270,
- 22-250,
- 22.,
- 222,
- 223,
- 243,
- 5.56,
- 7mm,
- 7mm08,
- accurate,
- ammo,
- away,
- barnes,
- barrel,
- bunny,
- bunnys,
- calibre,
- cheap,
- cost,
- death,
- deer,
- fired,
- hare,
- hares,
- injury,
- load,
- long range,
- m77,
- mag,
- magnum,
- phone,
- pills,
- plinking,
- rage,
- range,
- ranges,
- recoil,
- recommendations,
- red deer,
- reloading,
- rifle,
- second hand,
- selling,
- shooting,
- short barrel,
- shot,
- small game,
- sounds,
- target,
- top,
- vixen
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
All times are GMT +13. The time now is 09:22 PM.
Bookmarks