Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 41
Like Tree32Likes

Thread: 284 win vs 280ai

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member sneeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    nelson/marlborough
    Posts
    3,462
    I have a 280ai on a M52 Cooper 3 lug action. It feeds perfectly and there is no catching on the case when drawing the bolt. The sako may have a different lug position though. The benefits of seating bullets longer are overstated generally and If i was in your position I wold throat the chamber so the loaded round would fit the magazine. Im still shooting whats left of my 162 Amax supply. Seated with a .040 jump at 3.380 OAL and running 2950 from a from a 23 inch barrel. The only time you will see any real gain in seating long is if it gives you enough room to drop a burn rate but modern powders like RL 23 largely negate that.
    @Puffin your comparison on the other thread is flawed in that by using 2209 you have picked a burn rate the suits the 284 but is faster than ideal for the 280ai putting it at a disadvantage. . I would also add that of all the combinations Iv run through QL over the years the 280ai consistently showed the the largest discrepancies.
    Moa Hunter likes this.
    Just a slopy retrobate

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Hawkes bay
    Posts
    904
    Quote Originally Posted by sneeze View Post
    I have a 280ai on a M52 Cooper 3 lug action. It feeds perfectly and there is no catching on the case when drawing the bolt. The sako may have a different lug position though. The benefits of seating bullets longer are overstated generally and If i was in your position I wold throat the chamber so the loaded round would fit the magazine. Im still shooting whats left of my 162 Amax supply. Seated with a .040 jump at 3.380 OAL and running 2950 from a from a 23 inch barrel. The only time you will see any real gain in seating long is if it gives you enough room to drop a burn rate but modern powders like RL 23 largely negate that.
    @Puffin your comparison on the other thread is flawed in that by using 2209 you have picked a burn rate the suits the 284 but is faster than ideal for the 280ai putting it at a disadvantage. . I would also add that of all the combinations Iv run through QL over the years the 280ai consistently showed the the largest discrepancies.
    The chamber will be throated to saami spec as I had always planned to mag feed. It will also have rl 26 or 23 behind it so should hum along. Will wait and see how if mag feeds and go from there
    sneeze likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Tikka 284 or 280ai
    By George22 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-04-2017, 07:30 AM
  2. Kimber 280AI
    By lindsay5 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 24-04-2015, 02:19 PM
  3. 280AI
    By Kiwi Greg in forum Terminator Products
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-08-2012, 08:27 AM
  4. Tell me about the 280AI?
    By LJP in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-01-2012, 06:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!