Thread: 7saum vs 280ai vs 7blaser vs?

Originally Posted by Noswal

I’ve run the numbers on all 3 and there isn’t much in it.
The Saum is definitely the most efficient by the numbers.
Less powder and mid velocity the (280ai 2840fps) (Saum 2850fps) (BlaserM 2885fps +10gr powder)
That’s the QL results and I checked a number of powder options.

The blaser takes about 4gns more my mate ran his at 21” for 2910ish from memory with 180s

Originally Posted by Kelton

The blaser takes about 4gns more my mate ran his at 21” for 2910ish from memory with 180s

That’s great. I’ve loaded for a Saum but not the others. These are simply the numbers I got from QL as I said. They’re not real. It’s a guide at best.
I didn’t have any actual inputs other than the generated program ones.

Originally Posted by Noswal

That’s great. I’ve loaded for a Saum but not the others. These are simply the numbers I got from QL as I said. They’re not real. It’s a guide at best.
I didn’t have any actual inputs other than the generated program ones.

I don’t actually have the saum real world data with the 180 so that 4 gns difference might grow not knowing where the saum would land with powder charge and 180s, it crossed my mind as soon as I wrote it that I’m comparing 168 real world saum for 180 real world blaser so apples for oranges I will certainly give it a go